Im thankful for any feedback on this one

I felt like it was OK to have a flattingrange here since MP opens dont get sqeezed that much compared to LP opens and we are pretty deep. Is that a mistake? Im almost always have a linear 3betrange and no flattingrange in the SB but here it seemed ok to change that. When the flop Xs through I felt I had sufficient foldequity with a GS and two overs to go for a stab when the flop is so dry. I decided to bluff river for the following reasons:

-Villian should not have many overpairs when X the flop
-His range therefor seems mostly weak pairs(7x and below) and Ahigh
-I block 98
- Its hard for villian to call without 3x or 8x

having T high on the river is a good enough reason to bluff

You should have a flatting range from the SB vs MP opens. Otherwise we are 3betting at too high of a frequency, and building to many pots out of position with medicore/weak hands.

Calling or 3betting preflop is fine. It depends on game dynamics which is best. Without any information, calling should be our default. We have a hand that plays very good multiway and deep stacked.

Good bluff spot, well done! Opponent doesnt have many hands that check back flop 3 ways, that will be able to call two streets. Bet turn and river larger (2/3 psb), to increase our FE against pairs.

Hm interesting about flatting SB v MP. I thought that it was okish vs UTG and should be avoided otherwise unless BB is a bad player. But if I think about it, BB has less incentive to sqeeze vs an MP open so therefor he will have a harder time to punish our capped flattingrange. Thanks a lot for the input. Could you maybe recommend a good defaultflattingrange SB v MP 100BB deep?


Yeah bigger sizing makes sense, are you bluffing riverovercards often with this hand?

Thanks again for the input!