Your numbers might be fine for that particular player pool (is it full of nits?), but I defend the BB more often (my VPIP there is around 24% IIRC), and I also don't fold to 3-bets as often as 77%. That's the sort of fold to 3b number I used to have about 4 years ago when "they always have it". :/
Technically, those stats mean you're quite exploitable, but the player pool probably isn't actively exploiting you. They will just be the bog standard nitregs that don't bluff much, so it's OK to fold more often if they are getting aggro, because they are so value-heavy.

Nothing I saw in a quick look at your stats looked like a glaring leak, and you're beating the game so far (albeit running a fair bit above EV), so you don't have much to worry about. Calling a few more steals and 3-bets (or adding some 4-bet bluffs to your range) might be advisable, assuming you have HUD stats/reads on various members of the player pool.

I would love to put my stats up here to help me improve but I'm terrible with this sort of thing.

How do I get my data from PT4 to here?

Hey, I used to be just a reader but after reading through the topic I thought maybe you could also help me. I think something is wrong with the way I play maybe I play too much on autopilot and I feel like my winrate could and should be better. Do you see any particular points where I should focus my work ?

This is SH (5 handed) NL10/NL20 for 6 months



And this is the zoom NL10 hands (6 handed)



If you can give me some advices that's great, otherwise it's cool too keep on doing the awesome job you do here. Have a nice day !

What period’s standard deviation are you using? Are you measuring the standard deviation of each hands results? each sessions results (I think)? each days results? Etc....

If each session how do you account for the fact that each has a different n? Or does it not matter?

A little Off Topic - but does anyone know of a poker calculator that can calculate odds if some cards are known? For example if 4 people folded to the SB in a 6max game and the SB had 99 and BB had AKo. If we knew the 8 cards folded did not contain an Ace or King but did contain a 9, how would that affect the odds?

It's been done before and posted somewhere on this forum, the effect is extremely negligible

NL10Zoom and NL25Zoom stars

I am feeling like I am getting coolered left and right, I'm trying to keep playing as well as I can but my confidence is taking a hit and unsure if I should change a few things up to adapt.

I know my W$SD is atrocious but I am making even less calls than I normally would, I am just behind so often!

I've tried checking back on the flop top pair decent kicker and 2nd pair any kicker as well as some Flush Draws with SD value to balance my check behind range and keep more worse hands in the hand...

I've made some bad calls in that sample but not a ton imo, some questionable shoves pre... I'm a fish right?

Thanks! I appreciate the response.

Equilab can do this, ..click "View" and then check "Dead Cards".

I don't know what you consider to be "extremely negligible", but that scenario essentially takes 99 from being a 55% favorite to being a 45% underdog. 99 loses 10% equity, and AKo gains 10% equity, ...seems rather significant to me.

Thanks! I feel like people say things like "its a coin flip" or "its negligible" because they really just don't know and don't want to sound stupid.

Oh yeah my bad, i thought he was asking something else

Hi all,
Started taking poker seriously around 11 months ago and now I have reached 100k 2NL 6 max hands. I played around 85% on Pokerstars and the rest on partypoker. Any leaks and advice? Thanks.

Hi guys, I was directed here by a friend who said this was a great community for NLHE. Many of my peers only play recreationally so I'm looking for a network to get feedback. I worked up a decent sample size and was wondering if anything stood out. It seems to be okay but ultimately I want to improve. Any advice is appreciated.

Some backstory: Played about 3 years of live poker but recently decided to take a real stab online.

Summary



Stats







Graph

Playing 6max tables on party, my blinds 3b is around 8, and im winning from sb and losing less than blinds in bb so maybe try that, especially vs btn.

The first stat that I noticed that seemed to be significantly different to what's "standard" was your low 3-bet percentage. I'd try and get that up to 5% at least, mostly by 3-betting more in the SB and on the BTN.

Stats seem very good overall, but your c-bet frequency could probably be increased a bit. Something that really stood out was your CO opening frequency. It's exceptionally high at 42.5%. That's a a bit wider than my button opening range! Are you making money in the CO position? I would have expected a number more like 25% for CO UO PFR%.
Indeed your c-bet freq might rise naturally if you stop opening so wide/weak in the CO.

hello! considering rake is it ok to rfi from EP 14%? should i go bigger or smaller as default? zoom nl5 10 esp*
ty!

NL5z first 20k hands.
https://imgur.com/a/xDjjVA0


Which stats seem out of line? I'm probably bluffing too much and my MP gameplay is probably leaking a lot.

Hello,

Wich stats should i add here for better analysis? sample is around 40k hands, mostly nl5

The first thing I noticed was that your style is very different to mine. I'm not saying my own numbers are better for that limit (I'm having a tough run in my latest microstakes zoom excursion, while playing a bit too "balanced", rather than exploitative), but your stats indicate you're definitely tending towards a much more aggro/bluffy style than me.

Overall VPIP/PFR/3b numbers look good/standard, but post-flop I think you're being too aggressive, as the C-bet% and Agg% are pretty high, and the WTSD is lower than average. (You're not seeing many showdowns). With regard to c-bets, I think you might be betting too many low equity hands, and not checking back enough top or middle pairs that work better as bluffcatchers. You're probably c-betting too much when OOP as well. You need to develop some checking ranges in spots like UTGvBTN, especially on boards where you're gonna get floated a lot. (For reference, my c-bet frequency UTG is only 35%, which is probably too low, but yours of 64% is almost certainly too high.) When coupled with your high barreling frequency, it seems you're probably giving villain easy folding decisions when you're ahead, so you rarely get the chance to induce bluffs, or take free cards when they might be beneficial.
It's pretty difficult to isolate exactly where any leaks might be, or what quick fixes I can suggest, but from the hands you've posted on the forum, I think you've been too eager to raise with draws in spots where calling would probably be better. Playing a bit more cautiously with mid-strength hands might be beneficial too. A bit of pot-control goes a long way. You've got a high WWSF, but winnning a lot of pots doesn't necessarily mean the same as making a lot of money. If you want your mid-strength value hands to get paid off, you have to slow down sometimes, and just go for two streets. Equally, you don't have to triple barrel with every draw in your range. You can/should give up with some bluffs on bad boards where you can't rep much value. Your style is also "high variance", which is fine if you can handle the swings, but I don't think it's necessary to be so aggro in the micros. Speaking of variance, this is still a pretty small sample, and you could just be running badly in some ways. (Losing in MP while winning UTG is an example of variance. You probably just had poor card distribution and a few sick coolers in MP, while you ran better UTG). The next 20,000 hands might be a sick heater. Good luck!

Well yeah you're right about I'm playing every draw aggro and rarely going for 2 streets. As far as cbetting is concerned, I think it's not too bad after all to have a cbet of 70-75% because the population folds a lot to cbets. But things get complicated when they call and my hand isn't that great, I get confused on when to give up or bet again. I'll keep studying more and try to add more hands in my checking range. Thanks

If you could post the POSITION report from HEM, that's pretty useful, especially if if has some c-bet stats. I like various esoteric stats, but adding "cold-call" and/or "unopened PFR" (aka raise first in) for each position can be quite useful.

this pretty much and I think pop dont overfold to cbets as much as you think

ACR NL5







Thinking about moving up while the run good lasts even though I should probably grind a bit more at this limit. I've tried to construct a 3bet defend range via using the top 45% of my RFI range. True fold to 3bet should be around 68-72 now which is probably still higher than optimal vs. most regs. Also been trying to defend BB/SB more often vs. late position opens. Not sure how much I should be calling from BB and less so SB but I've been following Snowie's recommendations loosely, so a lot.

Next step is moving to Ignition or Global cuz I've been playing the same 30 or so Russians from NL2-NL5 for 100k hands now. Also gonna try to finish Janda's book and learn to play balanced without a HUD as PT4 trial is running out.

Final ACR NL2 graph which includes a 50k hands of breakeven/downswing. I'm not running as well as the all-in EV suggests.