SORRY ALL, I meant to change this title, thought it worked but I guess I don't know how to do that.
I was thinking of a particular hand where a friend c-bet AKs, dubbed the turn when he improved and then tripled and we were thinking it may have been a bad line
but i thought maybe I should just ask about the reasoning behind my thoughts before posting the actual hand.



I have been working with a guy and we put our stats together and we both thought just based on personal, anecdotal, experience that the following things were true for nl25 and nl50 among most of the population;

They play too fit or fold on the flop
They call again on the turn too often once they do call the flop
They fold at least enough and maybe exploitatively vs triple barrels.

We take this to mean;
tend to c-bet one and done with bluffs
only take the most pristine double barrel bluffs
tend to fire the third barrel if you bluffed the flop and turn.

Thoughts on these ideas?

(Again, I'm going to flesh this out some in the next post).

Thanks,

It’s unlikely you can generalise any level of poker with these broad statements.

Who was the last raider preflop?
Is it a 3bet pot? Single raised?
What are the exact positions you are in? This is crucial, not just in position or out of position.
What is the board texture (this one itself is really broad as well)
What sizings are you talking about? Have you tried how they react to half pot bets? Pot bets? Overbets?