Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuko
do you think the open raise size should be a variable here?
I suppose it would be, but at the moment it's restricted to a single 2.5bb open.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceres
Well now I've learnt two words ITT
I wonder if SB v BB srp would follow a bimodal meta pattern then? Or would we see more of a mix with a wider uniform spread given it's a cross between high SPR and positional disadvantage against a capped range (i.e. BU v BB in reverse, with wider ranges and a greater demand for geometric sizings than SB 3! BU).
This same logic would play out in oop srp cold-call scenarios too. Although of course it must be very situation dependent. You'd also have to pin IP to a range which for any practical purposes is annoying. Does GTO-Wiz attempt this?
Would be interesting to compare UTG v BB with BU v BB too. We would check more as UTG because BB can hit better boards, but how would this effect our (presumably) bimodal pattern? Would we steal from the top or bottom to balance?
The UTG vs BB charts are in that other thread at the top; same bimodal trend but less pronounced. I'm assuming it has to do with the tighter calling range reducing the asymmetry.
SB vs BB srp would be really interesting to graph! I wonder if the effect would be more or less pronounced, or a different shape completely? Need the premium membership to access that report though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TRUSTtheDRAWCESS
This is why GTO Wizard is the nuts. I am so pumped for turn aggregation reports.
Right!? Imagine being able to graph the the entire tree, or even the most common lines filtered for different positions? We might discover new heuristics or gain a deeper understanding of bet sizing theory in general.