I fold pre but 3-bet is just as good imo. Unfortunately I think your average ignition 5nl drooler calls with A9/A10, and PPs. You would think something like J10,J9 would fold but there's some omega Calling stations in this pool
3betting all combos of KQ here is too loose in theory but vs the fish go ahead bro
Arent we supposed to go 1/3 with our entire range on every flop?
Not a fan of postflop because we block QJ which folds at some point as well as two sets of backdoor flushdraws which fold when we can block one with the diamond combos.
Would prefer to 3barrel AK and if you want to Ad4d and As4s since we block some sets that way
is 49t rainbow really good for a preflop 3betting range. Doesnt look like it would be . The turn 2 isnt the worst card because all of villains draws are still drawing. atleast it wasn't an 8 Even if DDPs play were solver approved not sure im doing it versus the average 5nl guy.
Last edited by dude45; 04-25-2021 at 09:03 PM.
Reason: typo
I think this is a good spot to overbluff, especially if you have no history with villain. Even with AT, he can't feel too comfortable. Dunno how the pool is on your site, but my recollection of 5nl on stars was pretty nitty. My only slight issue is with you choosing this particular hand. The Qs is probably the card you most want villain to have as AQss, KQss, and QJss could all take this line and fold (and even QTss if villain is a little nitty). The K does block one combo of KTs, so it's not all bad.
Overall, I'd say you definitely have a fair amount of better third barrel candidates (and probably also better candidates on earlier streets), but sometimes you just have to go for it if villain or pop is too nitty with the calls. I'd still much rather see this with a hand with no spade, and preferably no club (to block Txs).
Folding KQ here pre makes zero sense unless you have substantial read Villain is super nit who only opens nuts.
KQ is a good triple here at some frequency. I would go 33% flop, 67% turn, 100% river. If we're tripling all of our viable bluff candidates, we're almost definitely over-bluffing so generally want to mix it up, but over-bluffing might not be a problem honestly. While micro population seems littered with stations, my experience, and what others have told me they've seen data to support, is that v lines like 3-bet/bet/bet/shove, XR/Bet/shove, XR/shove, they do not call down as light as we often assume