Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah)

06-11-2008 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nextgenneo
If this proves popular I wrote some stuff a while back on

* 3betting and playing against 3betting
* Double barreling
* Check raising continuation bets (both for value and as bluffs)

so I might put those up for you guys.
Please put up... this is great stuff.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
07-13-2008 , 04:57 PM
Hey guys. Thanks for all the PMs and responses in the thread. Glad I could help.

Sorry I didn't put the other stuff up but I am working on writing a lot more and putting it in book form (because theres no good books about online 6max). Hopefully I'll be done with it in a few months so will let people on the thread know.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
07-13-2008 , 06:50 PM
As good as your article was and as much as i would like to see the other articles or more stuff from you OP...

Quote:
Originally Posted by nextgenneo
(because theres no good books about online 6max).
Totally loolz at this.

Ryan Fee and Billyjex have both brought out very good books about online 6 max and they've been spread around like wildfire in the books&publications forum.

I really like your basic style though. I think if you do write a book you should look at these first and maybe try to aim it at purely microstakes as alot of the concepts or reccomended plays in these two books are only applicable at 100nl+ most of the time. i.e. 3-betting light with SC's. You just can't do this at 2nl,10nl or even 25nl somtimes.(i'm aware that 100nl is micros but i mean micro micro's which is where alot of beginners are).

A really simplistic primer for NL 6 max would be amazing, with a similar level of clarity and order of your article.

anyway thanks
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-25-2008 , 05:04 PM
The links on the first page seem to be out of date.

Is there an updated version of this available anywhere?

Thanks.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-25-2008 , 06:06 PM
yes, i would also love this !

felgamous [at] gmail.com plz
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-25-2008 , 06:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ama0330
Thank you Nextgenno, I'm going to add this to the sticky.

I didn't see it. Anyone have an old link for us?
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-25-2008 , 07:07 PM
yes, pls post a new link !
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-25-2008 , 07:32 PM
the link from the OP isn't working; is there another one?
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-27-2008 , 10:17 AM
links are back up
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-27-2008 , 10:41 AM
I think im in love with 2+2
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-27-2008 , 10:46 AM
vnh
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-27-2008 , 11:39 AM
Quick question:

so i know this article applies to most micro's but wouldn't you want a tighter range for the lower micros and open it up abit for the larger ones. This is because 10nl plays way way different than 50nl.

I could be completely wrong on this but do to vils playing way crazier at 10nl i've found i need to tighten my ranges considerably and generally flop strong hands and get payed off by middle pair calling 3 streets while at 50nl i find that getting people to fold is abit more profitable. For that reason i can play looser later and play abit more poker.

What do you guys think on this?
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
08-27-2008 , 04:07 PM
doesn't work 4 me (link)
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
09-04-2008 , 11:00 AM
thanks for giving back man...appreciate it...

very good read btw
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
09-07-2008 , 03:41 AM
TYVM for this it really helped.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
09-07-2008 , 07:33 AM
bump
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
12-09-2008 , 05:26 PM
Really got alot from reading this, has helped my game massively. Thank-you very much, and hope you keep on writing.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
12-09-2008 , 06:53 PM
Don't want to discourage the writer because the concepts he's describing are good and all...

But the writing is horrible. After the comments here I was expecting some brilliantly crafted treatise on 6-max and it reads like something thrown together in a night.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 04:11 AM
good stuff

I'm new here but you recommend folding or 3 betting and go against the cold call. What hands should we be doing each of these three with.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 06:03 AM
thanks for taking the time to write this.

One question though. You say you should be raising limpers with any pp, but what if you're in the SB with 22-55 and say CO and BTN limp? Surely just completing would be better here.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 07:35 AM
That'd depend on their propensity to call postflop.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ooohjoy
That'd depend on their propensity to call postflop.
So let's say they're the average fish at my table 30/2/1.0 with a fold to cbet of about 50%.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 08:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birkin
So let's say they're the average fish at my table 30/2/1.0 with a fold to cbet of about 50%.
I think with your small pp in SB you may be better off just calling the BB and going for set value, more so when i look at the stats you're using as an example. I don't think either is necessarily a bad option, but this is just my preference.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 09:40 AM
If there are two of those, I'd call. If there's one, I'd raise and cbet most good flops.

Edit:
Yay, post 666.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote
01-14-2009 , 01:27 PM
ok thanks guys, i usually do a bit of both, just wondering if one was more +EV.
Giving back. Very basic theory on NLHE (kind of pooh-bah) Quote

      
m