Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Critique My Range: CO Critique My Range: CO

06-19-2018 , 02:14 PM
Playing 5NL and 10NL on Ignition using this range for RFI.
{22+,A2s+,K8s+,Q8s+,J8s+,T8s+,97s+,86s+,76s,65s,54 s,ATo+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo}
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 06:22 PM
I would advise adding K5s+, 2gaps suited like T7s, 96s, 85s, 74s, 63s, A8+, K9+, Q9+.
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 07:34 PM
Not much to say about that range. It seems good. I open a near identical range for 2.4x. The only differences in my range is opening A9o, K6s+, and T7s.
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
Not much to say about that range. It seems good. I open a near identical range for 2.4x. The only differences in my range is opening A9o, K6s+, and T7s.
You open 100% at 2.4x? Was thinking about leaving the top of my range at 3x since anonymous
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 08:15 PM
I toyed with that strat for a while but I found that my range suffered when calling down in 3bps. It really blows when you find yourself calling down and you don't have AK/JJ/QQ in your range and AA/KK if you slowplay those at some frequency.
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 08:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by .isolated
I toyed with that strat for a while but I found that my range suffered when calling down in 3bps. It really blows when you find yourself calling down and you don't have AK/JJ/QQ in your range and AA/KK if you slowplay those at some frequency.
Im not sure if thats relevant? If our opponent doesnt know that we split our range then we can just merge our range when making call-down decisions, no?
Critique My Range: CO Quote
06-19-2018 , 08:24 PM
I don't understand what you're saying.

There's a difference in philosophy in how we approach the anonymous game so I doubt we'll agree here . I don't treat them as anonymous.
Critique My Range: CO Quote

      
m