Quote:
Originally Posted by DooDooPoker
This guy had a zero 4bet % before this hand over 384 hands
shouldn't indicate too much. nobody 4bets at 10NL.
this is a typical spot where hud stats falsely dominate good theory. guessing you'd normally play KK a bit differently, but drastically changed the line because of stats. if the original strat was good, it's unlikely this is a good method for adjusting...i have a ton of experience looking at my HUD, and making play based on that (for a long time I thought this was the best I could do. ended up costing me a lot, but it was 10 years ago and the games were easy)
i think
as played OTT it's a jam over the bet. but it's going to be marginally profitable if that. QQ/AQss and some AJ are best bets...maybe some AQo.
Quote:
Re: Cowboys in trouble 10NL
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rikk View Post
Depends on strat for those. I flat QQ against this guy and most others, AK and AKs are kinda tricky though. Probably flat both and proceed with caution. That might be bad.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Doesnt that leave your 4bet flatting range weak? Also i'd rather keep bluffs in by flatting AA/KK.
I notice bluff frequencies go up too when the pot is huge preflop and people tend to play worse in 4bet pots because they are unfamiliar with ranges
there's value taking it down. That's
27 big blinds rake free.
if villain 4bets suited junk, he'll flop a flush draw only 1 in 8 times. but when he does, he may get all the chips in for 100bb, and with AA you're a little better than 60%... [0.6*200bb - 0.4*200bb = 40bb...less rake =
30bb(!)
Last edited by Tuma; 08-19-2018 at 02:16 PM.