You have the A of dimonds which is good but he gets better than 3:1 on a call so he could call pretty wide (he just needs 25%). I don`t think on anybody folds anything for that price on the river.
You have the A of dimonds which is good but he gets better than 3:1 on a call so he could call pretty wide
not how it works, people should never bluff these spots. Villain should call slightly less than 50% of the time and us having the Ad makes that bluff +ev in theory but at nl2? hmm
not how it works, people should never bluff these spots. Villain should call slightly less than 50% of the time and us having the Ad makes that bluff +ev in theory but at nl2? hmm
Yes thats the math from our perspective. I just say what villian sees and basicly said the same thing don`t play gto Poker on NL2...
LOL ok you go ahead and keep calling 70% of pot sized turn bets when you "might not be behind" with A high in a 3bet pot. Let me know how that works out for you.
LOL ok you go ahead and keep calling 70% of pot sized turn bets when you "might not be behind" with A high in a 3bet pot. Let me know how that works out for you.
At 2nl my WR was near 30bb/100 fwiw. AK is still the nut no pair and when we have 2 overs and the nut flush draw OTT folding to a single bet would be a mistake.
Everything was fine until the river. It's just too fancy for NL2. It's not a bad play in theory, but players at this level aren't playing a theory based game and we should be looking to exploit them because of that.
Folding this turn given the action would be pretty weak, imo.
I think with the AKx i cbet here. Follow up with any low diamonds on the turn, and i dont think the Q will hit villains range too often on the river so seems like agood runnout to barrel to me.
don't like it.
V will have a good amt of strong value in his range (all the sets, some flushes) and will not be betting river too thinly on a 3flush turn. Even V's Qx may well exploitatively select a smaller sizing (like 50%). also neither the T nor Q being a diamond is bad for us.