Quote:
Originally Posted by newguyhere
Not sure if this is what they were talking about, but I know there aren't as many flops that a solver will range bet as I thought there'd be when I first heard about the strategy.
At least not without doing any node-locking.
Of course, that doesn't mean we should never range bet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTOJacob
Yeah obviously you can’t range bet every single flop
But to say range bet is always a mistake is just not true and would be impossible to know even if it was true
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You misread, or I did not explain correctly. 100% cbet is a leak, though I see it in our population all the time (except 50nl and up).
There are certain flops to range bet, for the raiser. Certain flops favor the caller. When you learn those flops, you can check call or check raise.
Solver also advocates donking, so you need to adjust the solve if you don't want to ever donk.
I MEANT to say always range betting is a mistake. If you do, there are lines one can take, which will print money.
Basic rules to begin with:
K J and/or T on flop good for raiser, Q good for caller, A in between.
One high card, more polar for raiser: less raising, less calling, more folding.
No high cards, range is less polar, more raising.
2 high cards, range more merged, more calling and raising.
You study these flops in solver, then run multiple locked and unlocked iterations to come up with strategy, best done with PIO or GTO+.
That is how it is known.