unblocking 4 combos of JTs and 6 combos of TT/6 combos of JJ is more important than blocking 2 combos of KJs/KTs. Since now we also block 3 combos of JJ and 3 combos of TT.
Not a huge EV difference but just something to note.
Villain is floating many Ax on the flop. I don't hate range cbet on K high board. But we need to check a lot on the A turn since we have many junk in our range after we range cbet the flop. As played, I would rather bluffing on a diamond river. Also be aware most Ax is going to chop on paired this pair board. If the Villain doesn't believe you have AK,KK,AA he will call you down light with any Ax. These hands will probably bet large ott.
Last edited by superpoker666; 10-29-2020 at 03:43 PM.
Villain is floating many Ax on the flop. I don't hate range cbet on K high board. But we need to check a lot on the A turn since we have many junk in our range after we range cbet the flop. As played, I would rather bluffing on a diamond river. Also be aware most Ax is going to chop on paired this pair board. If the Villain doesn't believe you have AK,KK,AA he will call you down light with any Ax. These hands will probably bet large ott.
You think Ax floats a lot vs 75% sizing?
I have way more Ax than him OTT. I have my whole 3bet range and he will fold a lot of Ax without backdoors OTF.
In my solve I have an Ace turn as the highest frequency bet turn card by a mile.
Interesting discussing on the flop sizing. I wonder if although the solver shows that range betting 33% is higher EV than the 75% sizing with some checking mixed in, if the pool as a whole will make more mistakes against the larger sizing, therefore making that line higher EV against the pool. My thinking is that most have seen the range bet 33% strategy plenty of times and are comfortable playing against it, whereas you dont really see larger bets in this spot as the IP player as much.