Quote:
Originally Posted by sixsevenoff
I would 3 bet pre to $3.75.
I'm not sure what a solver would say on the flop, but versus that sizing I would x-r $2.
I would probably go a little smaller on the turn, but I like the x-r.
I like river sizing, and I snap fold versus the raise. Villain's line is so nutted. If he's bluffing right here it's an isolated incident.
Ty!
Yeah this is probably a 3bet most of the time.
Even solver folds pretty much every Thi flush and lower.
Quote:
Originally Posted by YanasaurBBQ
I don't think the sizing could be a mistake. I would expect him at this point to have KQ and sets in his range and maybe AA if hes sticky w it or very rarely 54 and the odd flush, but he's on the BTN so he has lower flushes than you too, not just higher ones. No chance I'm folding. But I dont think the sizing can be bad because hes going to be pretty inelastic with all his sets and KQ, probably calling your bet size at near 100% with those hands.
Thanks! We probably have to fold river.. vs this line we only have a bluffcatcher. Villain is not supposed to raise worse flushes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by whitemares
I know pre should be 3b 100% for a smaller open, not sure how that changes vs 3x
River seems like one of those spots where random reg never bluffs because there's not much left behind after you go so big otr, especially in a spot where you're already polarized
You of course have a jamming range otr, I might size down a touch to ~66% for the other sizing, idk if you want to go too small on a brick after the turn x/r
Ty!
Yes you're right, I don't think people will bluff too much vs this strong line.
Good point about never going small after we polarize OTT! I think this is correct.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DooDooPoker
I'd fold river - Villain has all Axcc/Kxcc down to K2cc
Also vs 2.5x T8s is 3bet like 90%. Vs a 3x it would be 100% I think.
Ty!
Yes you are right. We can probably start calling better flushes than this. We have a bluffcatcher only.