Quote:
Originally Posted by CCuster_911
a good counter argument? How about financial responsibility? Your posting in SL...If you can afford to throw 1 months salary at a watch you should be paying back student loans or some other similar college expense instead..your psoting in SL, you are making absurd fashion claims and generalizing it to Americans even though you are clueless...How is that for a counterargument?
We are not collective trolls trying to piss you off, everyone thinks most of your posts are absurd
Most people who consider my posts ridiculous are spending not even close to the same amount of time on fashion as I do, so I am not really clueless as you put it.
I've never said the first you should do after college is buying a watch. If you got loans, this also subtracts from your salary and what not. Now you are arguing semantics, while I clearly posted a guideline for people, so the watch looks somewhat congruent with the rest.
Btw, I am more and more convinced that the "American fashion is different, LOL Europe" is an excuse for people. People just dont care about fashion and dont educate themselves, so they get personally offended when someone criticizes their taste.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzthe3rd
Hey brah it is all about a cohesive look and for some of us that includes earrings. I don't make these calls, just go with what the ladies prefer.
How is it totally reasonable for a student/newly graduated population when 99% of people that we deal with can't tell the difference between a 500, 1k, and 10k watch? The one I received the most compliments on in my life by farrrrr was a cheap watch but it 1. looked good and 2. worked.
It's as always not about what others think.
If the first thing people recognize about your outfit is the watch, then you are doing it wrong, a watch needs to be more subtle, so the compliments argument is plainly stupid.
And obviously the majority of the population cant tell the difference, but that's because they have no idea about watches, it doesnt matter if they cant tell.
It's the quality, that's important, a good watch is timeless, you can wear it forever. When you take good care of it, it'll last 10 years easily and then you spend <1% of your salary on a piece of jewelery, that's not a lot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by solsek
Based on this I'm going to agree with everyone else. If you are spending "1 month's salary on a watch", I would hope you would do enough research to find out that the wristband is usually the last thing you worry about when searching for a good quality watch (esp. between $500-$2k). But that's besides the point. Spending $XXXX on a watch when you are doing it as a fashion statement as a college student is really irresponsible (unless you can afford it). Spend $20 on a bro watch and you'll feel like an all-star.
About bands:
Basically they are very easy to replace with aftermarket bands of many different styles/materials (nylon, leather, stainless steel, rubber), so choosing on a watch based on whether it will match your shoes or belt is very lolbrostatus. Make sure your eye shadow matches the color of the dial.
Good god, sorry, but this is soooo far from the truth.
Where did I say a college student should spend 4 figures on a watch? Point out the post to me and I definitely correct myself, but given I've never said that...
Your statement about wristbands is plainly ridiculous. The wristband is obviously super important and should be of major consideration, but given the fact that most of the people ITT dont find it necessary to match belt and shoes, I am not surprised.
Basically the clockwork and manufacture of the watch are more important, but that's a given and you should get advice on it.