So I really wanna have a date planned for next week, there is a perfect event on. I've got my own ideas, but if you were gonna give it your all to meet a girl and ask her on a date and you wanted to meet her irl and she had to be a random and had to be hot, how would you to about that?

If a few weeks relationship needs an engagement to keep up the excitement, a six week marriage will need kids to keep up the excitement.

This might be the dumbest thing anyone has ever done ITT. And lol @ 3+ years of engagement.
Dunno about the US, but in Germany there are legal differences between being engaged and just dating.

And a marriage is not easily reversible, as LKJ has pointed out, it can cost a ****load of money and I hope for the love of god that you will sign a prenup.


People should legally be forced to be dating for 4 years and living together a considerable amount in order to be married, this would cut the divorce rate in half.

knowing ZZ3's history of trolling the soc.c.er threads on SE i have a feeling this is one enormous level. there's just no way he's this dumb.

I don't understand the question. You should go out to a venue where people converge to socialize -- a patio would likely be a good start.

It is only money. Assuming you don't do something ******ed like host a wedding considerably more elaborate than you can afford and fund it with credit this isn't a big deal.

In some cultures getting married is actually financially beneficial and even after paying for an elaborate wedding the couple gets to bank $20-40k+ in cash. If the parents pay for the wedding they bank $80-120k.

This is exactly what's going to happen to a couple who would get married that quick.

It will also be their first marriage, so they will throw a bigger party.

The whole affair just screams trouble.

this and him saying 3,5 years

^ agree, or at least I hope so, for his sake

The more days that pass the more I seem to realise about Krypto...

She was actually with two other guys between me and Prick. I reckon she can't be happy alone and needs attention or something to be decently happy. I also think she cant see past how much of a prick that Prick is. Just like I couldn't see all this about her at first.

I really, really (for her sake more so than for my own benefit) hope she realises that she needs to be able to be happy alone and I also hope that she is able to see through Prick sooner rather than later.

It seems she is pretty emotionally unstable. That being said I would still try with her again if the opportunity arises, but with an entirely different mindset. It would ****ing kill me if we couldn't work something out because of emotional issues on her part or mine. That being said, you can't exactly tell someone you think they're ****ed up and can't be alone and need to get their head right so we can work something out.

In a slight update to the situation. The sister yesterday told me quietly that tensions in her house are extremely high between her parents and Prick now that he is back. I don't get how everyone that knows him thinks he's a prick, except for Krypto. Surely she will see past this sooner or later, if she's able.

I lie in wait still.

This has to be why it got almost no initial reaction. I'm certain I'm not the only one who just thought he was kidding/leveling at first.

With that said, I sort of believe he's being truthful about this now.

Jasonsc,

stop being obsessed with that girl. Stop caring about her problems.

Get back to your own life.

Jason, just promise me that when this ends badly (and it will), you will take some time to review your posts. You are still rationalizing your way to the conclusion you want.

this is fairly pathetic

Jason- did you ever answer about anything physical happening?

I doubt this girl goes around guy to guy NOT wanting action. Maybe your mistake was just not making a move.

I seem to remember him saying he was "entirely happy" with the physical side of things. Who knows if they actually had sex though.

I'd put all on no and be confident

What would you say if someone asked him if he had sex and he said, "I've been in long-term relationships. YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN."

his mistake is becoming completely obsessive over a girl he barely knows

yeah but he's probably been lucky enough to have been in long-term relationships WITHOUT couches also getting in the way which takes it to a whole new level

I would put it at 70% no sex.

If there was sex I would put it at 99.999999999% that it was his first and only.

This was witty and/or clever.

thanks nearly as clever as the post i was quoting imo

You seem mad.

i just came in to post "u mad" in reply to whatever you'd post, but it appears we are essentially twins who think/post the exact same way yet again

Gotta fight sophomoric fire with sophomoric fire.

Karak, I'm trying to not purely talk about his definite emotional/mental problems and possibly give some advice or something.

LKJ, uhh, thats interesting but I'd probably just not reply and be sorry for them lolol.
But, with that response I'd chalk it up to A) it was a LTR- they wanted to wait- LTR died before sex occurred, or B) yes they did, but not often and it wasn't that good.