Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WSOP- 2017 ? WSOP- 2017 ?

07-25-2017 , 09:04 PM
Go, Hesp, Go! Amiright?
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-30-2017 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
...I don't care for The Giant, it seems odd and too cheap. I like the schedule this year, though. Seems like it will appeal to a lot of rec players. I'm guessing dneg will hate it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Eight
...Honestly I'm not too excited about the "Giant 365$" with 20-minute levels but wait and see.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattc74
Giant Event essentially a Turbo
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWillie
The $365 Giant is a smart gimmick, not that I want to play in...
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFly
17.8% takeout on "The Giant" - Good grief, loan sharks have better terms than that!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
I'm confused on who they are targeting with The Giant. The buyin is too low for serious pros looking for serious money. While the buyin is appealing to rec players, especially if they're on a budget, they'll have to come back again a month later or so to play Day 2 if they make it that far. For rec players who work and/or have families, that's not a viable option. The whole event just seems odd and out of place, especially for a tournament series which prides itself as the best of the best.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gardenz
The come-back-in-a-month and low buyin appears to be targetting locals. Who else could they be targetting?
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
Then why make the buyin so low? Those people would rather have a higher buyin and a bigger prize pool. It seems like they thought low-roller recs like me would like it, but as soon as I saw it I knew I wasn't interested. Hell, Vegas is only an 8 hour drive for me, but I'm not going to take a second trip and maybe have to take time off work for what might amount to a couple hundred buck payout even if I last quite awhile into day 2.
Quote:
Originally Posted by busto23
Because not all tournaments have to fit your schedule
Just like the aria $550 got a ton of entries, this one will get too. Plenty of regs that will fire this, plenty of amateurs too. I like the idea and the scheduling of it....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
Are you going to play it? There sure isn't much buzz about it and you're the first one I've heard to express any interest whatsoever in the event. The Giant will be a flop. Yes, they'll have a couple thousand (unique entries) play but it will be far from "Giant." The need to come back for a day two narrows the potential field size too much.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadlysyns
Not every1 can afford $1k+ buyin tourneys....With that many flights they should have a 1 million dollars prize pool.
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
The Aria event two years ago was a huge success. I'm not sure this one will be as successful given the variety of alternatives, but I doubt it will be a flop. One thing they are not doing, which was likely a large contributing factor to the Aria's success, is putting out a big guarantee. That is what really drives rec numbers. Frankly, designing an event geared towards recs and not putting out a guarantee is a bit self-defeating.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
I'm aware of that. That's why Colossus is a hit. My point is those people who can't afford $1k+ buyin work for a living and can't afford to take off work to go back to Vegas a month later if they happen to make Day 2. So why even bother playing Day 1 when they can just do Colossus all in one trip for only a couple hundred more?
Quote:
Originally Posted by busto23
Plenty of people that can't afford $1,500+ buyins but can fire away a couple of $365s and decide to come back if they make day 2. Guaranteed.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deadlysyns
only wsop will know the total unique entries...

my guess will be over 1000+ entries with all the renetries.
Quote:
Originally Posted by busto23
Lol are you joking? Average circuit $365 reentry gets over 1000 entries, Chocktaw just got over 5,000 people. Easily will get 10,000 people not sure if unique or not but ya. Probably $333,000 for first.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
I'm guessing 5,000 unique entries, max. For an event they label as The Giant, that will be a huge disappointment for them. In fact, I'm guessing the event will siphon some from Colossus and Colossus will end up with even fewer entrants than last year.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtt300
I'm going with 15,000 entries in the Giant!! Probably 20k!! Anybody who makes day 2 will make the trip back!!
Quote:
Originally Posted by rm81
You guys are missing the point on the Giant, the last flight might get 9000 entries, those people will not have to wait, the other flight might only be like 5-6k people combined.
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
I think some of you ae waaaay overestimating this event. Of course, no one really knows for sure. I'm sure the folks at the WSOP thought their "Carnival" series from a couple years ago would have been a much bigger hit than it was. And I doubt many really saw how big Colossus would be that first year. So, you just don't know for sure till it happens.

In any case, this Giant event definitely seems to be geared towards rec players with its price point and weekend schedule. Yet, its a turbo format, it has no guarantee, is a 7:00pm to 3:00 am tourney and requires the player to come to vegas twice to make any serious money. These are all decidedly anti-rec-player factors. It really seems quite self-defeating.

In thinking it over, I don't think this will be nearly that popular. I imagine the first 4 starting flights will only get a few hundred entries each. The 7/7 flight will likely be the largest, but its on the same day as the primary ME satellite day and the Ladies event. The Rio can only accommodate ~5000 players at a time, so I don't see this final flight getting much over 1K. They may even have to cap it if those 1PM and 4PM satellites are heavily attended.

At this point, I just don't think the Giant will eclipse 2000 entries total. But I guess we'll have a better idea once that first flight is in the books.
Quote:
Originally Posted by busto23
How much money you wanna bet on that under 2,000?
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
I know most rec players don't care so much about rake. However, in order to get a really huge field there will have to be much more than just rec players. I think players who DO care about rake will look at this and say, "non thanks" in lieu of other low cost options.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedOak
This ^^^^^ . Good observation. If they get 2,000 players they will be happy. But I suspect they will get between 6,000 and 9,000.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
They won't be happy with only 2,000. They call it The Giant because they expected it to be huge but not Colossus big. If they get under 10,000 uniques, and they will get far less, they'll be disappointed. I'm guessing it will be so bad they won't bring it back next year.

Dneg complained about Colossus being too cheap when it first came out. Does anyone follow him on twitter or anything and know if he has weighed in on The Giant?
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
The "Giant" will be a good case study in marketing. On its merits, it seems like the tourney should be a relative dud... nothing much more interesting than the other nightly DDS tourneys they have. But the WSOP put the word "Giant" on it. Based on similar tourneys and the other events going on on that Friday 7/7, I think 2000 total entries is a fair estimate. If they get much more than that, it will certainly be a testament to the power of slogans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFly
I predict way fewer entries than other people are predicting. This is basically a 7pm Daily Deepstack that happens to award a bracelet, oh and you have to come back up to a month later if you make Day 2. I just don't see throngs of people, reg lines clear down the hall, for a Friday 7 p.m. $365er. But, I guess we'll see......
Lots of chatter about the "Giant" tournament prior to the WSOP this summer. Well, the people have spoken...

http://www.wsop.com/tournaments/resu...d=15619&dayof=

And this was definitely a much bigger success than I and other people expected. Looks like busto23 was closest with his pre-event predictions.

I'd be really curious to know the per-flight numbers and uniques. Anyone have access to that kind of info? I'm sure there were tons of multi-entries, but still, 10000 is nothing to sneeze at. I just can't believe so many people were willing to play a 7pm-4am turbo, just to get a shot at a decent prizepool and a bracelet. It seems like there were better options. But this just goes to show the power of the WSOP brand.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-30-2017 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
Lots of chatter about the "Giant" tournament prior to the WSOP this summer. Well, the people have spoken...

http://www.wsop.com/tournaments/resu...d=15619&dayof=

And this was definitely a much bigger success than I and other people expected. Looks like busto23 was closest with his pre-event predictions.

I'd be really curious to know the per-flight numbers and uniques. Anyone have access to that kind of info? I'm sure there were tons of multi-entries, but still, 10000 is nothing to sneeze at. I just can't believe so many people were willing to play a 7pm-4am turbo, just to get a shot at a decent prizepool and a bracelet. It seems like there were better options. But this just goes to show the power of the WSOP brand.
Busto was close but I was mostly talking about uniques. I googled it and couldn't find anything but I wasn't digging very deep. Uniques is where it's at, for me. I think they should always differentiate between uniques vs rebuys.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-30-2017 , 03:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Meh
Busto was close but I was mostly talking about uniques. I googled it and couldn't find anything but I wasn't digging very deep. Uniques is where it's at, for me. I think they should always differentiate between uniques vs rebuys.
I agree, and I believe the trend overall this summer was that there were fewer players spending more money, which isn't necessarily the best thing long-term. However this event still did a lot better than I thought. Hopefully someone can provide the uniques figure, and maybe the per flight numbers, which would also be interesting.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-31-2017 , 11:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
I agree, and I believe the trend overall this summer was that there were fewer players spending more money, which isn't necessarily the best thing long-term. However this event still did a lot better than I thought. Hopefully someone can provide the uniques figure, and maybe the per flight numbers, which would also be interesting.
I am curious how many went out and sprayed the entry fees around the various properties instead of just at WSOP. I know I had entries at five different properties across my three trips out there in June. The ONLY money spent at WSOP was for the Seniors Event. WSOP scheduling just did not work for how I was having to do my travels to balance work and poker...

So...safe to say I spent a LOT more than I did last year, just that it wasn't spent at The Rio. Absent changes on the schedule, next year will likely be the same even if I spent MORE time in LAS than I did this year.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-31-2017 , 11:46 AM
My guess is that people just playing generic NLH within one price range were property loyal. If not playing just generic NLH (non-NLH, or Seniors NLH or Women's NLH) you had to go to multiple properties.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-31-2017 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle227
I am curious how many went out and sprayed the entry fees around the various properties instead of just at WSOP. I know I had entries at five different properties across my three trips out there in June. The ONLY money spent at WSOP was for the Seniors Event. WSOP scheduling just did not work for how I was having to do my travels to balance work and poker...

So...safe to say I spent a LOT more than I did last year, just that it wasn't spent at The Rio. Absent changes on the schedule, next year will likely be the same even if I spent MORE time in LAS than I did this year.
Based on your other comments, I think you're precisely the sort of "rec" player the WSOP sort of abandoned this year with their premier weekend events. Unfortunately (at least IMO), they didn't take a big financial hit for it, so I'm not sure anything will change in the near term. However, I heard a lot of chatter around Vegas at other venues. The shine is off the WSOP. At some point, its gotta hurt them.

As for me, I played only one WSOP event... the MS. And I was in town for a month. And I, too, spent lots of money at lots of other sites.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
07-31-2017 , 09:04 PM
Same. I only played one event but played elsewhere for the rest of the week.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
08-09-2017 , 09:16 PM
Anyone know how to get all your wsop buyins....who to email?
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
08-10-2017 , 06:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by michelle227
I am curious how many went out and sprayed the entry fees around the various properties instead of just at WSOP. I know I had entries at five different properties across my three trips out there in June. The ONLY money spent at WSOP was for the Seniors Event. WSOP scheduling just did not work for how I was having to do my travels to balance work and poker...
Exactly the same for me. WSOP Sr. and then events at the Aria.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
08-10-2017 , 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
Lots of chatter about the "Giant" tournament prior to the WSOP this summer. Well, the people have spoken...

http://www.wsop.com/tournaments/resu...d=15619&dayof=

And this was definitely a much bigger success than I and other people expected. Looks like busto23 was closest with his pre-event predictions.

I'd be really curious to know the per-flight numbers and uniques. Anyone have access to that kind of info? I'm sure there were tons of multi-entries, but still, 10000 is nothing to sneeze at. I just can't believe so many people were willing to play a 7pm-4am turbo, just to get a shot at a decent prizepool and a bracelet. It seems like there were better options. But this just goes to show the power of the WSOP brand.
I guessing the starting time helped in some way. Maybe people that busted early in other events thought "why not?" since it was a DS and a turbo.. if you bust, it's only $400. Like you I'm curious on the # of unique entries and flight regs.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
08-11-2017 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_snail03
Anyone know how to get all your wsop buyins....who to email?
its called saving your receipts.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
08-11-2017 , 04:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by the_snail03
Anyone know how to get all your wsop buyins....who to email?
Login into Total Rewards and then use Contact Us option on the bottom to request the receipts.
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
09-05-2017 , 08:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by akashenk
Lots of chatter about the "Giant" tournament prior to the WSOP this summer. Well, the people have spoken...

http://www.wsop.com/tournaments/resu...d=15619&dayof=

And this was definitely a much bigger success than I and other people expected. Looks like busto23 was closest with his pre-event predictions.

I'd be really curious to know the per-flight numbers and uniques. Anyone have access to that kind of info? I'm sure there were tons of multi-entries, but still, 10000 is nothing to sneeze at. I just can't believe so many people were willing to play a 7pm-4am turbo, just to get a shot at a decent prizepool and a bracelet. It seems like there were better options. But this just goes to show the power of the WSOP brand.
The Giant had 6,909 uniques with 10,015 total buyins.

# of buyins # of Players
11 1
9 2
8 6
7 15
6 28
5 59
4 167
3 395
2 1281
1 4955
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote
01-02-2018 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedOak
The Giant had 6,909 uniques with 10,015 total buyins.

# of buyins # of Players
11 1
9 2
8 6
7 15
6 28
5 59
4 167
3 395
2 1281
1 4955
found some flight entry info...

1A) 1,629
1B) 1,230
1C) 1,606
1D) 1581
1E) 3969
WSOP- 2017 ? Quote

      
m