Quote:
Originally Posted by FakeKramer
To all the "oh wow, I can't believe she's touting UB" people,
Can you please put that gripe aside long enough to realize that if she wins this touranment is will be the greatest thing to happen to the poker world since Chris Moneymaker (if not ever)?
That's certainly your opinion, and you're welcome to have it. Assuming you are talking about an influx of female players into tournament poker as a result of a Tiffany victory, do you have any evidence that these will actually enter the open tournaments and not the segregated ones? The whole purpose of "female only tournaments" was to bring new players into poker, and what percentage of the main event this year was female? Around 3%, and they represented more than that of the money finishers -- a pretty strong indication that the supposed influx of 'female dead money' by giving women preferential treatment just isn't happening; they're staying at the level where they get the preferential treatment, and the best female players get to choose from higher ROI/lower entry segregated tournaments or lower ROI/higher entry open tournaments.
*IF* Tiffany's victory were to result in the elimination, once and for all, of segregated poker tournaments, you *may* be correct; I say "may" because we have to ask, will it be worth the cost? A player being hyped through the roof for no other reason than her gender and comeliness? Such "style over substance" hype is not exactly something poker is short of these days.