Quote:
Originally Posted by DoGGz
Is the APPT a good example? They have wide ranging buyins from the $10k Aussie Millions to 2.5k Macau and lower.
The Aussie Millions isn't really part of the equation as it was only added a year ago and wasn't built off of Pokerstars.
The stops that I'm referring to are Seoul, Cebu, Auckland, Queensland, Macau. These stops need "added value" sats just to reach a 1 Package guarantee. 7 years ago these stops ran with 5 packages guaranteed no problem. The LAPT was the last tour that sustained itself online with an organic player base. EPT's are an example of a tour that can fill its online needs through travelling pros. The LAPT doesn't attract these players so they need regular players from these regions.
Not surprisingly the biggest detriment to these tours was Spin and Go's. This format syphoned off recreational money that in the past might have been spent on Live Events. But there's nothing that can be done about that.
I don't have the answer and I don't think there are any besides Pokerstars spending money on the LAPT and treating it as a loss leader.