Quote:
Originally Posted by TDChrisG
just posted all the info, check recent posts
Your structure sheets don't exactly make much sense. For the first one:
Buyin is 100+30 for flight 1, 10% make it through. Each of those 10% get 100k avg chips, $400 in their pocket, so $600 (100/.1-400) goes into the prizepool.
Buyin is 200+40 for flight 2, 12% make it through. Each of those 10% get 100k avg chips, $400 in their pocket, and $1266 (200/.12-400) goes into the prizepool.
Buyin is 305+45 for flight 3, 15% make it through. Each of those 15% get 100k avg chips, $400 in their pocket, and $1633 (305/.15-400) goes into the prizepool.
Direct buyins for day 2 contribute 900 to the prizepool and get the 100k avg chips.
So...why would anyone play anything other than flight 1? Seems pretty absurd that by playing the 350, you're contributing 175% more to the prizepool as those who play the $130, and 81% more than those who just direct buy for 1k.
For the second one you don't list rake or fees at all (which is absurd), but running the same numbers and assuming base values for each of the flights,
Buyin for flight 1 is 235 (assuming 200+35), 10% make it through. Each of those 10% get 100k avg chips, $500 in their pocket, and $1500 (200/.1-500) goes into the prizepool.
Buyin for flight 2 is 340 (assuming 300+40), 12% make it through. Each of those 12% get 100k avg chips, $500 in their pocket, and $2000 (300/.12-500) goes into the prizepool.
Buyin for flight 3 is 450 (assuming 400+50), 15% make it through. Each of those 15% get 100k avg chips, $500 in their pocket, and $2166 (400/.15-500) goes into the prizepool.
Direct buyins contribute $1700 into the prizepool and get the 100k avg chips.
So less bad, but still bad enough to make me wonder why playing the 450 could possibly be good value.
What am I missing here?