Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
It's not illegal. Just not allowed by the WSOP, at worst. But if a person played any satties at all, they can just claimed to have chopped a couple, and that's how they got the lammers. Since WSOP doesn't facilitate chops, there's no way they can prove you aren't being truthful even if they bother to look up satty winners. There's no record of players that chop satties.
That's silly. You want to have long waits to get a satty going? That's what happens when you have substantially fewer players. Megas will suck, so will STT's.
"It's not illegal. Just not allowed by the WSOP", - Oh for heaven sake Pig what's the practical difference ?
As to the use and you have it backwards - As the story is told
YOU had to PROVE you won them at a Satty. "Kevin Mathers, who runs the WSOP Twitter account, was able to clarify that this year the lammers are issued with some sort of receipt when they are won. This receipt needs to be shown in order to cash lammers in.
“There’s some sort of paperwork when you win a seat as they ask for your Caesars Rewards card,” Mathers wrote."
Long waits for satty's - I Agreed it is logical that there will be fewer but the ones that run will logically be softer also. I can wait an extra 10 minutes. I don't think increasing my EV is silly.