Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
The competition will likely be be significantly different.
Different, but not significantly different IMO and IME. The Monster will be a decent amount softer overall than even a regular $1500 freezeout, partially due to field size, partially due to it being a tourney that lots of small stakes recs use to take their big shot, because of the structure.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pig4bill
Field size doesn't matter all that much. You only play one table at a time and people get knocked out of the low entry ones quicker. I like them because if I manage to encounter just a few donaters, their chips carry me farther than my skill can. I know there's almost no chance to make it to day 4 or 5, but I never got past day 1 in the "normal" sized tournaments. I technically bagged the Monster, but that was because I entered late.
Field size matters a ton in variance of results and moderately in field strength. Everything else being equal, a larger field is weaker than a smaller one (everything else being equal in case anyone wants to say OMG are you saying a Flamingo $80 nightly with 30 runners is tougher than the Poker Players Championship or whatever).
And for variance of results, imagine it this way - you are the best player in a 9 player sit n go that plays every week. At the end of a year, you are very likely to be ahead, b/c the variance is much smaller based on the small field. Your skill has more chance to dominate results over the luck factor. Now instead imagine that you played 52 tournaments with several thousand players in each, and stipulate that you were the best in each. Now, there is a significant chance that you will be down at the end of the year, because there is simply a significant luck factor needed to advance in any single tournament through thousands and thousands of runners. You have to never get coolered, and never lose an all-in when covered. If you get AA vs KK all in preflop 10 times, winning all 10 is about an 11% shot. Obviously if you ever get it in worse than that, you have even a lesser shot.
I enjoy playing large field tourneys, and the huge prizes up top are fun and exciting, so I'm not trying to say don't play them. But there is a significant reason to work in smaller field tournies to smooth variance, especially if you aren't super deeply bankrolled.