Quote:
Originally Posted by Siculamente
More spoilers because I don't want to ruin it for those that haven't seen the show.
The thing that made the first couple of episodes for me was the editing. It had just an incredible pace and tone that was set purely through the editing. Then they decided to change editors for episodes 3 and 4 (I'm assuming it was an availability issue), and it completely changed the feel of the show, in my opinion (they completely changed the structure of the interrogations/interviews/flashbacks). I felt it hurt the show, and even though they brought back the original editor for episodes 5, 7, and 8, they couldn't recover how much different the show had become since his original two episodes. It's not that noticeable to a lot of people, but I think it was a huge error for the show to not have the exact same editor for all episodes (when you have the same director for all episodes). All editors have their own styles and shorthand, and there's just no way an editor can capture the exact speed and tone of another editor unless they're actually trying to. When you're in the work, though, you don't have time to think about that. The director has to get it as close as he can to that original vision, and hope for the best. One noteworthy thing is that the second editor was actually nominated for an EMMY for episode 4, which was fine and great out of context, but not so great in context with the first two episodes if you watch it purely for editing, in my opinion. I would have loved to have seen Alex Hall edit all of the episodes, just to see how much greater the show might have been.
To DC's note about TD, Hannibal, and Fargo, I think all three of those could be interchangeable in a lot of people's top 3 for 2014, solely based on taste. I love film noir, and that's a big reason why Fargo is #1 for me. That was just absolutely perfect modern noir, that wasn't cheesy at all. For me, it's Fargo A++, Hannibal A+, TD A, or something to that effect. We've been very spoiled in 2014.