Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
TV: what have you been watching? TV: what have you been watching?

08-07-2014 , 02:49 AM
Manhattan is pretty good so far, worth watching imo. About the development of the US atomic bomb. Important historical stuff.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 03:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kioshk
Manhattan is pretty good so far, worth watching imo. About the development of the US atomic bomb. Important historical stuff.
Sleepy Hollow is packed with American history.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunnehi
Spoiler:
Part of what brought the case back into focus was the suspicious death of the Preacher who had all the schools, and the discovery of the videotape in his safe. Once he was dead, the "cult" effectively died, since he was keeping the dirt. Other than the lawnmower man, he was the only one left in the present. The lawnmower man was still just killing for "fun", but fairly rarely.
Spoiler:
The man died because MM broke into his house. the "cult" found out and killed him because he could've ratted on other members now that he was exposed. imo the cult didn't die, it was just protecting itself.

the last two episodes were anti climatic, which made me critique other parts of the series. If the show had a strong ending I probably would've overlooked WH's character.

I wanted MM and WH to bring those guys to justice, but I would've been satisfied with a zodiac (2007) moment, where they know that we know that they're ****ing evil
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 02:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siculamente
Spoiler:
The man died because MM broke into his house. the "cult" found out and killed him because he could've ratted on other members now that he was exposed. imo the cult didn't die, it was just protecting itself.

the last two episodes were anti climatic, which made me critique other parts of the series. If the show had a strong ending I probably would've overlooked WH's character.

I wanted MM and WH to bring those guys to justice, but I would've been satisfied with a zodiac (2007) moment, where they know that we know that they're ****ing evil
Spoiler:
It's strongly intimated that Rust killed him or that he killed himself. So, no I don't believe what you're saying about the cult killing him. I think he was the last one, and meeting Rust again made him realize that he would go down for it (so, either Rust offered him a way out, or he decided it was time to take a way out). Rust was taking the tape no matter what.

You fell into the ending trap that a lot of people who were unsatisfied with the show did. As much as it might cause derision from people who might read this spoiler, the show wasn't a cop show, as I've said multiple times. It was a character study. There was a case that people could follow, if they wanted to, but the show was purely intended as an exploration of two guys, and what happened to them because of this one case. Without that one case happening, they would have been two completely different people by the end of the show.

If their development wasn't what interested you, then, yeah, it's easy to be upset by the resolution. The case was never a focal point, but a starting point and an always sitting there tangent. I don't think the show was ever intended to be some kind of allegory about how we're all powerless to stop power, but it became an offshoot at some point. That's why I think they're actually going to have a power storyline be a big deal in season 2. That is kind of interesting to explore.

To wrap up, if you feel like going for it, just watch it again for the characters and their development into these guys they were in the present. It will present the show in a completely different way where the case doesn't really matter, despite being the thing that got the whole ball rolling.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 02:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunnehi
Spoiler:
It's strongly intimated that Rust killed him or that he killed himself. So, no I don't believe what you're saying about the cult killing him. I think he was the last one, and meeting Rust again made him realize that he would go down for it (so, either Rust offered him a way out, or he decided it was time to take a way out). Rust was taking the tape no matter what.

You fell into the ending trap that a lot of people who were unsatisfied with the show did. As much as it might cause derision from people who might read this spoiler, the show wasn't a cop show, as I've said multiple times. It was a character study. There was a case that people could follow, if they wanted to, but the show was purely intended as an exploration of two guys, and what happened to them because of this one case. Without that one case happening, they would have been two completely different people by the end of the show.

If their development wasn't what interested you, then, yeah, it's easy to be upset by the resolution. The case was never a focal point, but a starting point and an always sitting there tangent. I don't think the show was ever intended to be some kind of allegory about how we're all powerless to stop power, but it became an offshoot at some point. That's why I think they're actually going to have a power storyline be a big deal in season 2. That is kind of interesting to explore.

To wrap up, if you feel like going for it, just watch it again for the characters and their development into these guys they were in the present. It will present the show in a completely different way where the case doesn't really matter, despite being the thing that got the whole ball rolling.
yeah, I can see that point of view about russ and the man. If I watch the series again, i'll keep that in mind.

Spoiler:
There's no reason why they can't have a character study with a strong ending. I keep going back to the wire-- it was a character study that also managed to have a strong ending (season 1 at least). It didn't have a star studded, blockbuster cast either.

so when I see a tv series starring MM and WH, two successful, talented actors who are also executive producers (given some creative development leeway), I expect a strong show through and through. I didn't get that at all. Instead I got a weak ending, and half the character exploration was unoriginal, repetitive. If they'd spent a little less time on WH sleeping with crazy psychos, and more time on a strong finish, it would've been a hell of a show.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 04:01 PM
The interesting thing about the show is that the people who watched it for the case wanted it longer. People like me wanted the show shorter, like maybe 2 episodes shorter. There were a couple of meandering episodes, and there are certainly issues with it (overcome by the acting and stunning visual style of the show). At the time, I thought it would be my favorite show of 2014, but both Hannibal and Fargo (especially) easily surpassed it for me. Fargo is probably my favorite TV experience since I've been in the industry (1994). I ate up every second of that show.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-07-2014 , 04:34 PM
great. ill check out fargo, thanks for the recommendation.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-08-2014 , 07:24 AM
Just finished up watching "Broad City"
It got a lot of love, but I just didn't 'get it' when the first couple episodes aired.
Went back and somewhere around ep 4 something kicked in. Actual out loud laughter.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-08-2014 , 07:26 AM
I like Broad City too.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-08-2014 , 11:32 AM
Beat Bobby Flay.

God I used to dislike him. He seemed like an arrogant prick.
He's either grown on me or he's changed his act. He's very likable now.

Similar concept as Throwdown. Compete against chefs cooking their signature dish.
But on Throwdown he practiced the dish beforehand.
On Beat Bobby Flay he learns the dish just before the bell rings and they have 45 minutes.

Has anyone else become a fan?
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-09-2014 , 08:10 AM
Good to see Series 3 of Borgen back to Aussie TV....liking the first two eps.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-09-2014 , 06:07 PM
Fargo was great, would watch again. It's not perfect but it was meant to be entertaining and it definitely was.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-09-2014 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunnehi
Spoiler:
It's strongly intimated that Rust killed him or that he killed himself. So, no I don't believe what you're saying about the cult killing him. I think he was the last one, and meeting Rust again made him realize that he would go down for it (so, either Rust offered him a way out, or he decided it was time to take a way out). Rust was taking the tape no matter what.

You fell into the ending trap that a lot of people who were unsatisfied with the show did. As much as it might cause derision from people who might read this spoiler, the show wasn't a cop show, as I've said multiple times. It was a character study. There was a case that people could follow, if they wanted to, but the show was purely intended as an exploration of two guys, and what happened to them because of this one case. Without that one case happening, they would have been two completely different people by the end of the show.

If their development wasn't what interested you, then, yeah, it's easy to be upset by the resolution. The case was never a focal point, but a starting point and an always sitting there tangent. I don't think the show was ever intended to be some kind of allegory about how we're all powerless to stop power, but it became an offshoot at some point. That's why I think they're actually going to have a power storyline be a big deal in season 2. That is kind of interesting to explore.

To wrap up, if you feel like going for it, just watch it again for the characters and their development into these guys they were in the present. It will present the show in a completely different way where the case doesn't really matter, despite being the thing that got the whole ball rolling.
I dont like all of these spoliers as it makes the conversation hard to follow, but at the same time I dont want to give anything away since the show hasnt been out that long. This is about the theory of how the preacher died.

Spoiler:
I think that you missed some dialogue while they are in the storage shed, WH asks MM if he killed the preacher, MM says no and that his theory is that the cult found out what was stolen from the safe and killed him so he could not be blackmailed. From that moment on I believe that its implied that that is what happened since all of MMs other theories have been correct. But my point is that the idea of the cult killing the preacher was not the idea of the poster above, it is actual dialogue from the show. So to say you don't believe what he is saying is a weird way to look at it. What you are actually saying is you don't believe the dialogue from the show, even though everything else he said was correct, why are we to assume that only that one piece of information was wrong?
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-09-2014 , 10:26 PM
It's been awhile since I've seen it, but no I don't take Rust's words at face value in any circumstances. There were multiple times where we saw action that did not match what he said, and I think he was constantly embellishing stories and re-writing history to make himself look better than he actually was.
Spoiler:
He also was trying to convince Hart to get on board, and saying that he did it would be a fast track to an arrest for him from a guy who still really absolutely could not stand him (and likely didn't trust him) at the moment he entered the storage locker.


When you're looking to connect the dots on the writing of a show, find out what the writers are doing. Then determine whether you think a shortfall of the show is a shortcoming of the writing or if it's...something else. For me, due to the overall high level of writing, that speaks to something else, but again, I haven't seen it since it ended so my memory could certainly be foggy.
Spoiler:
The question you have to ask yourself is how Rust got the videotape if the cult members took it and killed the guy over it. That should give you the answer as to whether what he's saying is the truth.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-10-2014 , 12:49 AM
More spoilers because I don't want to ruin it for those that haven't seen the show.

Spoiler:
I understand Nunns point of view. It's true that MMs character embellished. He could have easily killed the preacher and then lied to get WH on his side. I can see that.

However, I don't think MM killed him. He said he broke into the houses when the preacher wasn't there. After he discovered the tapes in the safe, MM tried to contact the preacher, but he'd already been killed. It was suggested by MM that the cult killed him because they found out that the preachers homes were broken into and his dirt was stolen.

I think the writers just got lazy with the last ~2 episodes
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-10-2014 , 01:03 AM
The last 2 eps being more in real-time took a lot of people out of it, sort of me included. The structure of the first 6 was perfection. It wasn't a bad choice by any stretch, but I liked that other way more. I don't know if would've worked had it been that way through 7eps, then half of the finale, with the last half being how it ended.

I think TD is my favorite of the year with Hannibal being a very close #2 (51:49) and Fargo at #3.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-10-2014 , 02:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Siculamente
More spoilers because I don't want to ruin it for those that haven't seen the show.

Spoiler:
I understand Nunns point of view. It's true that MMs character embellished. He could have easily killed the preacher and then lied to get WH on his side. I can see that.

However, I don't think MM killed him. He said he broke into the houses when the preacher wasn't there. After he discovered the tapes in the safe, MM tried to contact the preacher, but he'd already been killed. It was suggested by MM that the cult killed him because they found out that the preachers homes were broken into and his dirt was stolen.

I think the writers just got lazy with the last ~2 episodes
Spoiler:
Your point of view is more plausible on this one, and I don't think Cohle killed him either. I think once Cohle got the tape he told the guy he was better off killing himself, so he did (it's very much in Cohle's personality to say that). It makes a good story to others for Cohle to say the cult came back and killed him, but how would he know that? So, I think we just got handed some more Cohle b.s.


The thing that made the first couple of episodes for me was the editing. It had just an incredible pace and tone that was set purely through the editing. Then they decided to change editors for episodes 3 and 4 (I'm assuming it was an availability issue), and it completely changed the feel of the show, in my opinion (they completely changed the structure of the interrogations/interviews/flashbacks). I felt it hurt the show, and even though they brought back the original editor for episodes 5, 7, and 8, they couldn't recover how much different the show had become since his original two episodes. It's not that noticeable to a lot of people, but I think it was a huge error for the show to not have the exact same editor for all episodes (when you have the same director for all episodes). All editors have their own styles and shorthand, and there's just no way an editor can capture the exact speed and tone of another editor unless they're actually trying to. When you're in the work, though, you don't have time to think about that. The director has to get it as close as he can to that original vision, and hope for the best. One noteworthy thing is that the second editor was actually nominated for an EMMY for episode 4, which was fine and great out of context, but not so great in context with the first two episodes if you watch it purely for editing, in my opinion. I would have loved to have seen Alex Hall edit all of the episodes, just to see how much greater the show might have been.

To DC's note about TD, Hannibal, and Fargo, I think all three of those could be interchangeable in a lot of people's top 3 for 2014, solely based on taste. I love film noir, and that's a big reason why Fargo is #1 for me. That was just absolutely perfect modern noir, that wasn't cheesy at all. For me, it's Fargo A++, Hannibal A+, TD A, or something to that effect. We've been very spoiled in 2014.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-10-2014 , 11:43 PM
+1 on Fargo. God I love Oliver Platt.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 12:02 AM
An Honourable Woman is really good.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nunnehi
It's been awhile since I've seen it, but no I don't take Rust's words at face value in any circumstances. There were multiple times where we saw action that did not match what he said, and I think he was constantly embellishing stories and re-writing history to make himself look better than he actually was.
Spoiler:
He also was trying to convince Hart to get on board, and saying that he did it would be a fast track to an arrest for him from a guy who still really absolutely could not stand him (and likely didn't trust him) at the moment he entered the storage locker.


When you're looking to connect the dots on the writing of a show, find out what the writers are doing. Then determine whether you think a shortfall of the show is a shortcoming of the writing or if it's...something else. For me, due to the overall high level of writing, that speaks to something else, but again, I haven't seen it since it ended so my memory could certainly be foggy.
Spoiler:
The question you have to ask yourself is how Rust got the videotape if the cult members took it and killed the guy over it. That should give you the answer as to whether what he's saying is the truth.

I dont see why you are taking a hypothetical theory of two side characters (the two black detectives) over the word of one of the main characters. (MM)

Spoiler:
I never claimed that the cult killed the preacher and took the tape, that is obviously not the case since rust has the tape. What I said, and again this is actual dialogue from the show, which makes it just as plausible as your idea that MM killed him, given that the only thing on the show that points to MM killing him is circumstantial evidence of the 2 black detectives, the fact that MM flat out denied killing him tells me that the writers didn't want the viewers to think of MM as a murderer. You are taking the theory of two side characters, over the word of a main character, I just dont see it. But again what i said was that the other members of the cult killed the preacher after they found out what was stolen so he couldn't be black mailed into giving up.


Also can you give some examples of when MM embellished some stuff and the action didn't match what he was saying? Not doubting you, just cant think of any off the top of my head.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 03:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChipWrecked
+1 on Fargo. God I love Oliver Platt.
check out diggstown if you haven't (movie not a tv show).

he also had a memorable albeit brief role in the ice harvest.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 03:32 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nab76
I dont see why you are taking a hypothetical theory of two side characters (the two black detectives) over the word of one of the main characters. (MM)
Spoiler:
Their whole rise to glory was told in a way that absolutely did not happen. At some point, I think the writer intended us to take what we saw happen on screen when Rust was narrating to be what actually happened. We saw how the whole Reggie thing went down, and it wasn't at all what Rust said happened. It's been too long for me to bring up other examples, but the thing to note is that Rust basically portrayed himself as a genius who knew everything, when the reality was likely that he was still having drug flashbacks. Something a lot of people speculated about during the show's run was whether we had an unreliable narrator situation. There was just enough "perfect" stuff going on that a lot of people didn't feel Rust was telling the truth, and I seem to remember there being a bunch of examples. I just don't remember them right now.


Quote:
Originally Posted by nab
Spoiler:
I never claimed that the cult killed the preacher and took the tape, that is obviously not the case since Rust has the tape. What I said, and again this is actual dialogue from the show, which makes it just as plausible as your idea that MM killed him, given that the only thing on the show that points to MM killing him is circumstantial evidence of the 2 black detectives, the fact that MM flat out denied killing him tells me that the writers didn't want the viewers to think of MM as a murderer. You are taking the theory of two side characters, over the word of a main character, I just dont see it. But again what i said was that the other members of the cult killed the preacher after they found out what was stolen so he couldn't be black mailed into giving up.
Spoiler:
Hold on a minute, I did not say that Rust killed the Preacher. I said that I think he told him that he should kill himself. Again, you're using pure conjecture to think that the cult would have even known about the missing tape. Rust took it, no one else would know he took it unless the Preacher told them, and he certainly wouldn't tell anyone in that cult that Rust took it (since he is the number one worst person to have it in the cult's eyes). The dots don't get anywhere near the cult for the Preacher's death, in my opinion, it's just the story that Rust tells to get people on board. If the cops thought he killed the Preacher, they would have arrested him. They didn't think he did it, but they wanted to know what he was up to (this could have been another situation where Rust fudged the truth, but I honestly can't remember right now). The only two plausible explanations are that Rust killed the guy or the guy killed himself. Based on Rust's very gruff personality, I think it's very likely that he told the guy his only real way out was to kill himself, and the Preacher agreed. Remember, Rust was a soul crusher, and a king of breaking people in interrogations.


Quote:
Also can you give some examples of when MM embellished some stuff and the action didn't match what he was saying? Not doubting you, just cant think of any off the top of my head.
As I said above, the best example is the Reggie LeDoux scene, but I'm sure there are others for when the conversation got personal, but again, it's been too long for that kind of detail for me to remember right now. That's hundreds of hours of TV watching back for me. I will re-visit it, but not yet. I've tended to screw up a lot of the small details on the show, due to the fact that I was so mesmerized by its artistic content. So, I could certainly have some stuff wrong here.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 10:43 AM
I've been evangelizing for You're the Worst all over 2p2, might as well do so here. It's the best new comedy I've seen in several years. It's hard and dark but not too mean or crazy to take seriously.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 02:15 PM
Lol, don't let RBK hear you say that
TV: what have you been watching? Quote
08-11-2014 , 02:46 PM
Does riverboatking not like You're the Worst? That's too bad. I think the world of it.
TV: what have you been watching? Quote

      
m