Quote:
Originally Posted by DC2LV
So 2 is your 2nd worst Die Hard, but is still damn entertaining? Interesting.
I've only seen the the first two, both in theaters 30+ years ago. While I've seen Die Hard numerous times since then, I'm not sure if I've ever sat through "Die Harder" again. I just could never get over the laughable plot point of numerous jets circling Dulles for hours until they were going to run out of fuel when both DCA & BWI were 10 minutes away. And because of that fact, I've never bothered to watch any of the other sequels, which I had been under the impression were all worse than 2. But if both of you believe that 3 is the best one of the entire franchise, maybe I should plan on watching it.
3 is pretty ridiculous, but has the most fun with the series premise I think, even more than 1. When I think Die Hard I always think of 3 first.
4 was 12 years after 3, but it really brought the franchise into the modern era of film well. I think it is a solidly entertaining action flick for its time.
5 is absolute garbage. I knew that going in (from reviews, it was the only one I hadn't seen before) but the wifey wanted us to finish the series and watch it. Wish we hadn't. Terribly made, written, acted, everything.