Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPoppa
Harry Potter was written as explicitly YA fiction. It's about kids in school.
The recent Star Treks have characters from 20 or so (Russian kid) to early 40s (Bones, Scotty), as did the original TV show. Subsequent TV shows had an even wider age range. So not sure what you're on about there.
Well, now I'm not sure what you're on about. First off, Star Wars is pretty YA targeted itself.
Secondly, Star Treks 2-6 were ancient, with only a handful of characters who could even be called "middle-aged".
The new one spread the age out a bit, but the core Pine/Quinto/Saldana trio are all pretty close. There's no "cool" character for older people or younger people to want to be.
But third and most importnatly, that's fine, because "there isn't a character in each demographic spot" is a INSANE complaint to make about a movie!
Have you seen literally any other movies? Most films don't even go with the ensemble act, was John Wick's only appeal to mid-40s white dudes? Fury Road had 2 leads who were both in the late 30s, and the third biggest role was played by a heavily armored truck. You don't need to hit tokenism for each demo to succeed.
But then here comes the real talk:
But even under this weird tokenism quota system, man if there is one demographic that doesn't need their ego stroked it's "good looking dudes in their mid-30s".
That particular demo, if not slaked by this one Star Wars movie, can presumably find some comfort in PRACTICALLY EVERY MOVIE EVER MADE starring a member of their cohort.