FYP...and added some HH observations.

did he admit to cheating?

last i heard he claimed that he simply ran into the tree and she tried to get him out of the car...

just because she is beautiful doesnt mean they get along (obv)...but even so, if he cheated he sucks...

the second chick looks pretty good to me, i imagine she would be smoking in a proper photograph...

I wasn't making any claims of understanding or to express moral outrage, only stating facts.

No...that's why I said "allegedly" And the alleged mistress just went to LA to speak with her attorney...

You like the trout pout, huh? Your taste in women is questionable, 3d...

and yeah, all you're repeating are - so far - baseless rumors

Apparently you missed the Steve Phillips thread.

Point is, men always want more pussy, regardless of who they're already getting it from. This is especially true for someone like Tiger, who knows he can get pretty much any pussy he wants whenever he wants it. If this surprises you then you have a lot more to learn about men than I thought.

Simmer down, tiger...I was attempting to make a humorous observation, not a thorough critique and/or dressing down...sheesh.

And so what if I'm repeating rumors? Did I say it was true at any point? What is your point here?

I really enjoy it when you act as a "killjoy". I'll be sure to return the favor shortly.

I wasn't dressing you down, Sally, relax. I was just letting you know how men are, that's all. And I wasn't accusing you of anything, just making a point that so far all we've heard on the situation are rumors...and come on, if you didn't believe that rumor, you wouldn't have bothered to ask your question.

hobby,
i wasn't attacking you when i asked if he admitted it...i was sincerely asking because i haven't been following it and heard some time yesterday that he said it was an innocent accident...

and my taste in women is definitely questionable

Did you read anything I actually typed before you hit reply and added your little zing on the end? The question was not that he allegedly cheated and even wanted to cheat, but that he picked someone questionably attractive to allegedly cheat with instead of the more gorgeous models/actresses that he easily could have gotten...

And I'm done with this. Instead of generating some witty, humorous responses, all I got was annoying, obtuse ones...

Number 2 should be tacked onto 1 Corinthians 13 at every wedding ceremony.
I believe it is written in stone and posted along the goat paths in many Middle-Eastern countries.

Hobby is correct. Alleged mistress is hardly a trophy.

Hobby, I was going to observe that the mistress must be a mathematician (note the pencil), and you know how men love women mathematicians.

My "zing" was meant to be lighthearted. It bothers me that you wanted your post to be taken as lighthearted as well, yet you immediately assumed the worst about mine.

That ugly chick from Britain's Got Talent [sic] will soon release her album.

Because my post was not personally directed at you (nor at any other Loungers unless some Lounger's and/or lurker's real name is Tiger Woods)...yet you addressed a personal remark straight at me and me alone. That bothered ME...and your zing really doesn't read "light-hearted" btw. More snide than anything.

dont be grumpy hobby,

have you found a proper date for you exciting december wedding?

I'm grumpy because Dominic and Landon made me grumpy. I was happy before...I bought a FREE scarf.

What do you mean "proper" date? Do you consider yourself an "improper" date?

My friend who is getting married is fixing me up with her soon-to-be hubby's best friend...she claims that he is "hilarious" and I like hilarity so we'll see..

It wasn't snide. If I had put a at the end it would've been fine.

And it doesn't matter if it was directed at you or not. The point is that you had to decide whether I was joking or not, and you reacted the opposite of how you wanted us to react to you. You can't suddenly change the rules because I might be insulting you.

Um... absolutely no. It absolutely makes a difference whether a statement is personally directed or not...because people are more likely to find an insult in something that is directed at them than a random, general observation. That's Internet Posting 101.

And more importantly, the "rules" are completely changed if I think you're insulting me. You're trying to argue for double standards when the situations are not analogous.

If I had initially responded to your first post with this: "Landon, I won't be taking any advice about male-female relationships from you when you're afraid to even talk to girls", how exactly would you have received that?

Horray for free things. Good luck with the friend. My friend tried to set me up with her cousin at her wedding, but it didn't end up going anywhere. Maybe your results may vary.

I'd like to think I'd have given you the benefit of the doubt.

Maybe next time rephrase your question/post so your intentions are perfectly clear. Don't blame the reader if your remarks are missintepreted.

It's so funny to be on the outside looking in on one of these.

Hobby doesn't need to rephrase her post next time. She was right. Tiger Wood's mistress is goofy looking and men are just hard to figure out. (killjoy )

Hobby,

I maded you a thread.