Quote:
Originally Posted by Chocaholic2
The Hustler?
I adore The Hustler, but a couple of the gambling moments miss the mark. First the "just for that kid, I'm gonna beat you flat" isn't something a seasoned hustler would say. You'd know how to deal with these cocky wannabes. But okay, he was at a weak character phase and wanted to show those punks what the game could be like when it was great. No, but okay.
The last match with Fats, though. Is Fats playing with his own money? If so, why? He knows Eddie can beat him when sober and motivated. You have to assume George C. Scott is backing Fats. But again, why? I guess he could be free-rolling if Eddie wins, but there's just almost no way anyone is playing for $3000 a game (in 1960, no less) without knowing whose money they're risking.
But it's such a great movie and those plot holes are relatively minor. Actually, Let it Ride gets gambling pretty right. It might be Ed and Joseph Walsh who are the keys to authentic gambling movies! From the California Split commentary track, I'm pretty sure they are a couple of degens.