I can't seem to find private joker's first review of this movie since his raves about it are what inspired me to go see it so I will just be giving my raw thoughts here:
A Single Man - written, directed, and produced by fashion designer Tom Ford
This movie is beautiful to look at as everything - the colors, the sets, the actors - are very gorgeous and sumptuous. And of course everyone is immaculately dressed (ldo). Overall, all of the actors in this movie were very good, especially Colin Firth and Julianne Moore. This hyper-stylization of every visual element in this movie is its greatest strength...but ultimately created a very stale and superficial emotional feeling imo (more on this later). This movie takes place in the early 1960s with Colin Firth's character, Prof. Falconer, a British professor who teaches English language classes at a small Califonria college, has lost his long-time male partner of 16 years due to a car accident. After months of grief and depression, he has decided to end his life and the movie depicts his final days as he prepares himself for his death. The entire movie is relentlessly told through Falconer's POV as we are shown how he sees the world supplemented by repeated voice overs. (I'm not much of a fan of a lot of voice overs in movies as I think that they're a pretty lazy story-telling device.) Even before the death of his long-time love, Falconer seems to be a somewhat repressed, cynical and melancholic character so framing the movie from only his POV necessarily imbues it with the same qualities, which may be why it seemed so emotionally arid to me. Add this on top of the extremely sytlized view of the movie itself and I was left with little to no feeling at all about it other than the thought, "well, that was nice to look at." It never felt poignant to me (except for one tiny part where Colin Firth cries but that was more due to his acting ability than anything else).
Also, I have some other major qualms with this movie but they need to be spoilered:
Also, there was a techinque used often in which the shot would be framed in such a way that object of the character's gaze would be situated in the corner of the frame and somewhat cut off. Intially, this was interesting and somewhat different but it quickly became annoying through overuse as I never felt that I actually got to see things fully. I'm not talking about the zooming in on eyes and lips part - that was fine. But when Falconer would be looking at another person's face, often that face would appear in a corner of the frame instead of in a more central position.
I will recommend it - more as a rental movie than one to go see in the movie theater though.
Also, pryor15, if you're reading this, I was hoping that you may expand a little more regarding your earlier comments how the editing was poor for this movie. What do you mean by that exactly?
Last edited by HobbyHorse; 02-13-2010 at 12:34 PM.