Re:
It
Quote:
It’s not really a horror movie … some kind of coming-of-age with a few jump-scares … while not a bad movie, it is far away from being a really good movie.
Quote:
it was one I was looking forward to watching … by the end of it though, I felt that hype was unjustified
+2
I would never bash anyone for liking it (or any movie for that matter) but I thought it was ****. Definitely over-hyped.
The CG effects were lame (tbh I’ve only seen good CG horror in
The Wailing and
Twin Peaks: The Return). And I abandoned ship about 10 minutes into the film, when they switched to the high school and employed a clumsy Aaron Sorkin walk-and-talk style shot, complete with embarrassing dialogue.
I fast-forwarded the rest to check out the “scary” parts, and I didn’t even get halfway through that. I should have known when a friend told me that it wasn’t really scary. What is it, then? I thought.
I agree that the source material is excellent. It’s the most filmic of all of King’s stuff, and I was excited when del Toro was interested in directing (I’m not a fan, but he’s a great visual artist).
The last horror film to do this well at the box office was
The Exorcist, I think, which I rewatched recently and it holds up extremely well. Still the scariest movie ever made, IMO. Light years ahead of
It in terms of seriousness and actually going for it.
Amazing how much
It grossed on pure hype. The 1990 TV series isn't great either, but it does have moments of genuine horror. Largely due to the acting of Tim Curry and a little makeup. I don't understand what's so scary about a jump scare when you can see it coming a mile away.