Quote:
Originally Posted by SimpleSam
I don't understand your line of reasoning here at all. My post that you quoted was specifically addressing your earlier posts about Blarg being combative. How you translated that into me using misogyny as some sort of shield to hide behind my dislike of Blarg's arguing style is unclear to me. Why in the world would I use misogyny as an excuse on a MALE-DOMINATED poker forum unless I fully believed that he was guilty of it? That seems very stupid to me, don't you think? Entertainme already succinctly explained in an earlier post re Blarg's misogyny that I fully agree with, so I don't really feel the need to rehash it again. But it's real cute to me that you just blithely dismiss out of hand those that are calmly and cogently disagreeing with you (and I don't mean me here). That seems like a real chicken**** response for you to have.
Didn't dismiss anything out of hand. Didn't agree with them, though. How this makes me "chicken sh*t" is beyond my comprehension.
You
did use misogyny as an excuse to pile on, because you are a small and vindictive person, and not afraid to make such a craven appeal to mob rule. As was anyone else who bought that line of horsesh*t solely as a reason to pile on. I said it before: F*ck 'em.
Quote:
Really? Is that why I left? Please tell me why I do everything because that's not the least bit patronizing at all for you to tell me why I do the things I do.
It may be patronizing. Doesn't mean it's not true. I certainly believe it was. And no amount of raving drama you wish to pile on will convince me otherwise.
Put it this way...I knew you well enough to predict what would bring you screaming back out of the shadows. I figure I'm probably right, here, too.
Quote:
I was referring specifically to your rationalizations in this thread, not anything you had done in the past. (But FYI, you are excusing his behavior right now by belittling anyone who doesn't agree with you re his misogyny. You're far from being diplomatic in your replies.)
You speak so poorly here, I'm not even sure what you mean. Basically, you're saying I was right when I said Blarg was a dick, but wrong when I said he wasn't misogynist. So if I call Blarg a dick for being Blarg, that's okay. But when I call others dicks for throwing out accusations I think are bull**** (as, I might add, do quite a few others, and not all of us are his "friends"), one of whom happens to be you, then I'm not..."diplomatic"? Okay. Sure?
Quote:
So...it's a questionable accusation because you don't believe it despite other people beside myself telling you that they considered him a misogynist? Fine. If kudz didn't see it, then it simply cannot be true. I guess Osama bin Laden is still alive too because I don't think you personally saw him get killed either. Or damn, there must not have been a rover that landed on Mars. Or Obama must not really have gotten re-elected because you weren't personally there to count every vote.
You are becoming progressively more strident and ridiculous with every utterance.
Other people have also said he wasn't misogynist. Are we
all stupid, or all walking around with blinders on? No, we're just his "friends", right? Even though we've all cited his faults, we're his "buddies", and not allowed to have an objective opinion, right?
Same old Hobby. Out of your league, and not afraid to whine about it.