Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Law School Law School

09-24-2009 , 12:54 PM
Noon to about 5:30 pm for my administration.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 01:08 PM
They say 7 hours because the people running it are there for 7 hours, people with disabilities get 53 minutes per section.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 01:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
They say 7 hours because the people running it are there for 7 hours, people with disabilities get 53 minutes per section.
Makes sense...thanks. For those without disabilities, 4-5 hours?
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by stakman1011
I've searched the thread to no avail, sorry if this is a repeat. How long does the LSAT usually last from when the test starts to when you actually walk out of the testing center?

The LSAC website says to leave 7 hours, but this seems way too long to me. 5 35 minute sections and a writing sample doesn't seem like it would add up to 7 hours. Maybe they just say 7 to be extra safe? Does anyone have any experience on how long it actually takes? Thanks a lot...
If I recall correctly, they spend lots of time telling people how to sharpen pencils and getting official rulings on whether they should kick the guy out who tried to take a piss before the thing started.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 02:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyWf
people with disabilities get 53 minutes per section.
Maybe I'm just a cold-hearted bastard, but this never made any ****ing sense to me what-so-ever.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 03:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karak567
Maybe I'm just a cold-hearted bastard, but this never made any ****ing sense to me what-so-ever.
nah i think your right on. "disabilities" means "add" which means you are such a vagina that you have to medically document the fact that you can't pay attention to boring **** very well.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 03:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by POKEROMGLOL
nah i think your right on. "disabilities" means "add" which means you are such a vagina that you have to medically document the fact that you can't pay attention to boring **** very well.
Well, I have nothing against people with ADD. I recognize it's a real disability. But when you are in the real world working for a client, you don't get "extra time" or considerations for having a disability. Why should you on the LSAT?
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 04:16 PM
It's also people who are blind or have like physical problems(e.g. palsy making handling a pencil harder). Those people deserve the extra time.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 05:06 PM
student: Im not very good at these logic puzzles no matter how hard I try. Can I get some extra time? It's too tough with these time constraints!

advisor: Im sorry, then maybe law school just isnt for you. We design the test to challenge students in areas that will be relevant to the challenges they'll face in law school and beyond.

student: Yea, but my psychologist said i have LDS. It's a newly recognized condition and it stands for Logic Deficiency Syndrome. He said I need more time to think my way through them, but that Im just as smart as everyone else as long as I have twice as much time.

advisor: Oh, LDS? Of course you can have the extra 30 minutes. We are very sympathetic to that particular shortcoming now that it has a trendy acronym label.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 08:59 PM
There was a girl at my law school from some European country, and because English was technically her second language they gave her an extra 20 minutes on every exam even though she had been speaking and reading English most of her life.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 09:04 PM
20 extra minutes would be amazing. I know I would get 100% in the logic games.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 09:07 PM
I saw a guy in a safari jeep all decked out with camping/survival gear parked in a handicap spot. Really bothered me.
Law School Quote
09-24-2009 , 10:38 PM
Sigh I'm taking it Saturday morning and now I'm going to be tilted all test about how I'd ace the logic games if I had an extra 20 minutes.

I've gotten between 164 and 172 in the past couple weeks on practice tests (lol variance) depending on how well I guessed and how much trouble I had with the logic games.

Run good one time?
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 12:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by POKEROMGLOL
I saw a guy in a safari jeep all decked out with camping/survival gear parked in a handicap spot. Really bothered me.


?
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 01:17 AM
For (hopefully) the last time, you will probably score 2-6 points lower than your last few timed practice tests.

You're nervous. You freak. Etc.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 01:20 AM
Yep. I freaked out. Clocked in a solid 6 points lower.

However, I have a friend who took the test, got a 154, started studying for a retake and never scored higher than a 160 on a practice test.

He retook it and scored a 165, his highest score ever by 5 points, practice test or real. He, essentially, jumped from auto-reject at this school to having a near full scholarship.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 02:52 AM
I did better on the rest test than on practice tests too. It depends on your personality, high strung people do worse on the real thing, lazy people do better, etc.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 03:21 AM
I'm lazy and did worse.

May have had something to do with the test takers verbally asking each other for answers across the room. If in DC, sign up early.

I mean I pretty much knew I would never be an attorney so I had no reason to be nervous.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 03:36 AM
I am pretty lazy, and I did much worse :-X
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 10:16 AM
I did worse my first test too because I was nervous, my timing was not down, and I misblotted 9 answers. Called LSAC and they said, "welp, better luck next time." Needless to say I was tilted into studying my ass off for 3 months straight and I had a +12 point jump on my next test.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 01:19 PM
When i took the bar exam I sat there for like 10 minutes at the end of the MC making sure I bubbled everything correctly and didn't miss some secret back page or something.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 05:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riverman
For (hopefully) the last time, you will probably score 2-6 points lower than your last few timed practice tests.

You're nervous. You freak. Etc.
I do better when I have actual emotions towards something. Get me a little juiced up, ya know? The past week of tests have been hard to feel like I need to do well on them knowing that the real thing is right around the corner.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 06:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karak567
Yep. I freaked out. Clocked in a solid 6 points lower.

However, I have a friend who took the test, got a 154, started studying for a retake and never scored higher than a 160 on a practice test.

He retook it and scored a 165, his highest score ever by 5 points, practice test or real. He, essentially, jumped from auto-reject at this school to having a near full scholarship.
I understood that schools average the two tests if you take it twice. Is this not the case anymore and they just take your higher score, disregarding the lower one?
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 07:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by agdci981
I understood that schools average the two tests if you take it twice. Is this not the case anymore and they just take your higher score, disregarding the lower one?
I think most schools take your top school. A few say they average, but I suspect the top one still carries more weight.
Law School Quote
09-25-2009 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottySo
I think most schools take your top school. A few say they average, but I suspect the top one still carries more weight.
as far as i know (not a ton), they take your top score if you take it twice, but they average it if you take it thrice. they changed the policy to top score because US News changed their ranking system i heard.
Law School Quote

      
m