Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid75
I just watched fat head. The narrator's voice got on my nerves. Both this guy and Morgan Spurlock's POVs regarding fastfood seem to be too far from the middle of the road. Both documentaries set out with very extreme objectives. It feels like they're trying to lead the audience too much. I mean, of course fast food is bad for you, and should be taken in moderation, but that doesn't justify eating it for 30 days to make you unhealthy, or eat it for 30 days to lose a bunch of weight. Sorry about the rant, it just feels like these documentaries are super condescending/patronizing to the audience. A lot of people are dumb enough that their decision making should be revoked, but that's certainly not everyone.
Ultimately, the vast majority of documentaries are still entertainment first and information 2nd. Of course neither was going to be from a perfectly balanced perspective. Both docs used the same stunt to try to prove a point, and to entertain the audience.
Are you really expecting to see a film where they just have super serious interviews with 1000 different doctors and nutritionists, and nothing else? That would probably be very balanced and informative, but about 90% of the audience would fall asleep. These are movies, not PBS specials.
SSM definitely played up the "you're too stupid to make your own decisions" angle. I don't feel like Fat Head was condescending to the viewer. It was condescending in a mocking way towards SSM.