Quote:
Originally Posted by Rooksx
In my search for literary crime novels, I recently read two books at the opposite end of the spectrum:
I Let You Go by Clare Mackintosh - whoever recommended this as literary crime should be deleted from the internet. This is everything wrong with genre; flat writing, thin characters, limited vocabulary, all tell instead of show. Soon after the murder suspect was arrested, I knew something wasn't right. How? Because the cops investigating frikkin say, "something's not right". Reader intelligence not required.
Plot is paramount, except the plot twists are inconsequential, predictable, and just plain stupid. I do have to wonder about the many who have praised the twists. I don't try to predict what's going to happen when reading or watching a film, but you must be surprised at the sun coming up if you can't foresee some crucial developments long before they're revealed.
It's my own fault really. I knew I should have avoided this when I saw it was a Richard and Judy recommendation. There couldn't be a more blaring warning signal.
The Yiddish Policemen's Union by Michael Chabon - now this is what I was looking for. Chabon embraces genre with his washed up detective protagonist investigating a murder. The difference is that Chabon can write beautifully and use characters to drive a story. The plot is actually quite barmy and somewhat reliant on unlikely occurrences, but I found it easy not to care about those faults.
Thanks for the warning about the first of these two novels.
I've read the second and agree with your assessment. You might enjoy following that up with Mordecai Richler's 1990
Solomon Gursky Was Here, which feels very much like a precursor to Chabon's novel, one he surely would have been familiar with. Denser and broader in scope but no less entertaining than
The Yiddish Policemen's Union, it is not formally a mystery novel, but it does offer the solution to more than one mystery.