Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
There's so much subjectivity with this that it's almost impossible to criticize any pick. I picked Buffer as a facemelter in a draft that I didn't take all that seriously.
I believe it is fact that there are good singers who are under 40 today. What a sad world it would be if that wasn't true.
I was also making reference to singers who are dead, but not Jazz, so it's not only age, but actual taste in music.(I'm more classically inclined than Jazz inclined)
Quote:
I also perceive voice as a talent not necessarily just something that sounds nice which is why I picked Michael Winslow. I didn't pick up for his normal voice. I picked him for what he's capable of doing with it. I can't think of anybody who can do what he does.
For sure, the voice that means the world to one person is atonal trash to another. It is subjective and admittedly, I shouldn't pick on it too harshly.
To get to the level that you can hold down a set of tunes for hours on end takes far more practice than people realize, and surely, doing that day in, day out, album after album, is an incredible feat of talent culminated from years of practice. So, even if someone dismisses a singer as "no talent," I prefer to consider the decades of practice that "no talent" put in.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbaseball
Another thing about this draft that is interesting is this question.
Is it the singer or the song?
Some singers can make almost any song sound great and some songs can make almost any singer sound great. There is a fine line here.
I took Neil Young for instance. But I don't wanna hear Neil Young do covers just like I don't wanna hear anyone else cover Neil Young songs. I don't know the answer. But I know I am choosing voices that I personally like to listen to.
It's a good point. I'd certainly consider Plant the voice of Led Zeppelin. It would possibly work without his voice, but that music is so ingrained with his voice that any other singer covering the band just sounds wrong. There's a few undrafted examples here that I feel are the same.
There are some songs that are so technically difficult that few can ever dream of covering them appropriately.
Then there are other songs that are so simple and universal that anyone can sing it, and oddly, many songs that are nearly impossible to sing as the original are covered to amazing effect by mere mortals.