Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Addicted to Serial? Addicted to Serial?

12-31-2014 , 07:19 AM
Interview with the woman who interviewed Jay: http://observer.com/2014/12/heres-ho...rst-interview/

Quote:
If I were to come to you at The Observer and say I want to write about a case and I don’t have the star witness, I don’t have the victim’s family, I don’t have the detectives, I don’t think you would run it, you know.”
Quote:
He’s a human being and I don’t think there was any way for him to have known that not giving an interview to a journalist would result in huge segment of the population speculating that he committed the murder. Like, for this article, people have asked me to comment and I’m commenting to you. I don’t think it would ever occur to me that if I didn’t comment to a journalist that somehow I would be punished by the internet. To watch somebody grapple with that … He’s like, ‘I’m freaked out.’ Basically, Jay said he and Sarah talked for 20 minutes in his house and when she reported it back it was used to demonize him. So he’s like ‘My fear is that it would have been 50 times worse if I would have talked to her.’”
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycosid
Part 2 of Jay interview up

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2...ve-jay-part-2/

Not the first time I felt really uncomfortable about this whole thing.
So it was an imam who turned Adnan in. Maybe Jay, the real killer, bought off the imam! What a twist.

That interview paints a funny/sad picture of Koenig sitting there extremely uncomfortable in the home of a black man. The whole podcast and the popularity of it is kind of ludicrous after reading Jay's interactions with this woman. She makes veiled threads, which perhaps fueled her own neurosis. And she describes explosive new evidence, which never materialized. Textbook example for how never to do investigative journalism.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:06 AM
I've started listening to the final episode again, here's a quote from SK:

"We've always said that Adnan was over the break up. It had been a month already. Just for argument's sake, let's say he wasn't over it."

This is a great example of how she has been leading her audience the whole time. There is absolutely no way of knowing whether Adnan was over her. She just assumes because he said so and because he was seeing other girls or whatever which isn't evidence of anything.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeralCreature
I think this experiment shows that this is not how one conducts a journalistic investigation. You don't dig up a 15 year old case and research it while the internet watches, speculates and harasses.

We've seen in the Boston bombing case how easily internet sleuths draw the wrong conclusions. We've seen with Sandy Hook that they will go so far as to harass victim's families. If you drag 15 year old case like this out into the light like this you better have a damn good reason for it, better than Adnan Sayed's big brown eyes, which was all Koenig had to show for her months of sleuthing.
Koenig has no responsibility for what other stupid people do with her story.

There is literally no better reason than potentially freeing a falsely convicted person. As the adage goes it's better to free 100 guilty people than to convict one innocent one.

Finally she had no idea it would be this popular. I'm sure she expected it to have 50,000 listeners max which would have be par for most podcasts.

Last edited by Clovis8; 12-31-2014 at 10:18 AM.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:16 AM
He may have been "over" Hae but he was still in regular contact with her right up until she disappeared, at which point he completely coincidentally never called her again.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:41 AM
She goes on in that segment to say they had broken up before and gotten back together, etc.

Well exactly, it had happened before but now she had started seeing this other guy she was crazy about so the finality of it all hit him like a truck. This is basically stereotypical behavior for jealous males, they want to be in control over women and when they realize they aren't anymore they want to destroy what they can't have.

It's hard to believe Koenig doesn't know this.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:59 AM
Listening to the podcast and then reading Jay's interview may have just turned me into a conservative, lol. Everytime I look at Koenig's picture now I just think she could not possibly look more like the naive, idealistic, emotional, self-serving liberal she is.

Adnan: How dare you bring up the stealing from the mosque thing, so unfair! I'm so upset!

How dare you think I'm nice and that you know me. I'm so upset!

Adnan: no I'm not mad at Jay at all for, at a bare minimum, covering up the murder of someone I loved and then framing me for it. Have only myself to blame for being a bad Muslim.

Koenig: Adnan you are so deep and complicated, I think I love you, um, I mean I think you are innocent. Hurrdurr.

Last edited by Pwn_Master; 12-31-2014 at 11:05 AM.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:05 AM
Spot on, Pwn_Master.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:22 AM
Koenig: would Jay not wanting to snitch and being afraid of the police because of some pot and general distrust of authority (haven't we all smoked pot, haha) really explain his inconsistencies? Doesn't really make sense from my perspective as a white, privileged liberal from an upper class background.

Jay: don't all you white people love the Wire? Yeah, that was my reality.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:29 AM
If only she had said anything even remotely like your "witty" post you might have a point.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:35 AM
Pre 9/11 did anyone even care about what Muslims were doing? The muslim community was scared to talk, which I could understand post 9/11 but what about pre?

Adan's inability to say what he was doing that afternoon between like 3-5pm has also bothered me. He is like "That was 15 years ago, like I don't know, I just don't know" Wtf do you mean you don't know? If you're innocent I'd probably have some sort of explanation. What has he been thinking about for the last 15 years?

Also, how common is it for someone to admit to being an accessory to a murder and get no time at all?
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 12:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jipster
I disagree. The podcast consistently veres towards the claim that Adnans prosecution being seriously flawed. Which it is.
I read it the way kos did. The question through 11 episodes was 'did he do it or not?' It only shifts in the last episode when she realizes she can't answer that question satisfactorily, and instead offers (almost apologetically) a conclusion that there is reasonable doubt and that she would vote to acquit.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 12:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPantz
Also, how common is it for someone to admit to being an accessory to a murder and get no time at all?
He's an accessory after the fact, so it would've been like 1-2 years or something. Also would've ruined his life. Guess it depends on your perspective as to whether you think that is deserved. I'd say the state's larger concern is making sure the murderer is removed from society.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 12:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPantz
Pre 9/11 did anyone even care about what Muslims were doing? The muslim community was scared to talk, which I could understand post 9/11 but what about pre?
This is from Rabia Chaudry's blog:

Quote:
What really happened in this case (beyond the fact that there was no physical evidence against Adnan) was the prosecution used every negative stereotype about Muslims and Islam and threw it at Adnan, seeing every single thing he did through that filter. The undercurrent of their case is deeply anti-Muslim and Islamophobic, it plays on the fears of nonMuslims about us. Honor killings, religious confrontations, controlling, angry and abusive men, honor besmirched by a young independent woman who left for another man. That was the narrative, the motive framed by the state.
Sarah seemed to pay little attention to this. It makes me quite curious what the prosecutor actually said in court and I can also see where Rabia is coming from. To hear the jury being manipulated like this must definitely have felt like a great injustice.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 01:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FeralCreature
Sarah seemed to pay little attention to this. It makes me quite curious what the prosecutor actually said in court and I can also see where Rabia is coming from. To hear the jury being manipulated like this must definitely have felt like a great injustice.
I can't remember which episode it is, but koenig talks about this at length and even quotes the prosecutor, iirc.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 01:21 PM
Damn I didn't pay enough attention obviously. I remember her talking about the Muslim issue but she seemed to kind of shrug it off IIRC. Like.. yeah, I don't know... not sure if that played a part.

If you are Rabia and watching that unfold I bet it's infuriating and you may very well convince yourself that that played a big part in the jury coming to their conclusion.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Truant
Edit : I think Adnon did it, not at best buy though which is why he was stuck on that detail.
This was one of my main takeaways as well, although we're obviously speculating based on the limited information available. But if he did it, just somewhere else and later in the day, then all the apparent inconsistencies start to evaporate. In that scenario, based on the podcast Jay is bull****ting about the time and location without apparent motive. But in his own words, the fear of facing significant repercussions related to his own drug dealing seem plausible.

I agree with others that the podcast is fascinating for reasons other than the "whodunit" angle, which ultimately is unfulfilled. It's interesting to see Sarah's struggle with her own bias and blind spots, and it's interesting to see how the legal system is so fragile and subject to juror irrationality, lawyer incompetence, and law enforcement obsession with building a case in lieu of seeking truth.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
He's an accessory after the fact, so it would've been like 1-2 years or something. Also would've ruined his life. Guess it depends on your perspective as to whether you think that is deserved. I'd say the state's larger concern is making sure the murderer is removed from society.
iirc he still had to plead guilty to that and it was a felony conviction which is still on his record unless he was able to have it expunged since then. The deal was for no jail time.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
the podcast was not about if he did it but if he should have been convicted. A critical distinction both morally and legally
Spoiler:


Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 06:45 PM
People harping on the fact that he didn't call "her" after the disappearance are unreal tilting. She didn't have a cell phone. He obviously would have heard about her being found almost instantly if she got found. Calling her house would have been nothing but annoying/insulting to her parents.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 09:08 PM
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/6310118?utm_hp_ref=tw

Thought this was a good read
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 10:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
seeing some positive stuff on twitter, but it seems like maybe this isn't worth the time commitment reading through the posts

not a big fan of this american life, a bit smarmy

will give the first ep a try as i'm going to sleep
this.

It used to be listenable to back in the early 2000's, but NPR, and TAL has become so politicized it has gone from entertaining to complete noise sewage.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jipster
http://viewfromll2.com/2014/12/29/se...ppeal-in-2003/

Very interesting read. This from a lawyer arguing points of law, not conjecture.
came here to post this.

Makes a solid case that Koernig is purposely twisting public opinion against Jay/ for Adnan as much as possible.

Koenig's reputation for journalist integrity is far beyond repair at this point.

Maybe she was always going only for entertainment value and she had no intention of mainaining any degree of integrity.

Massively scummy thing to do when the reputations of several people hang in the balance.
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PFunkaliscious
came here to post this.

Makes a solid case that Koernig is purposely twisting public opinion against Jay/ for Adnan as much as possible.

Koenig's reputation for journalist integrity is far beyond repair at this point.

Maybe she was always going only for entertainment value and she had no intention of mainaining any degree of integrity.

Massively scummy thing to do when the reputations of several people hang in the balance.
If by "her reputation is beyond repair" you mean the podcast is being heralded widely as brilliant investigative journalism by nearly the entire journalism world and has become a cultural touchstone of 2014, then ok good point. She really is in trouble!
Addicted to Serial? Quote
12-31-2014 , 11:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clovis8
At a minimum he helped bury an innocent girl and now is whining that a reporter knocked on his door. Lol to him. Seems like pretty minor karmic payback.
really?

Not talking to Koenig is the right move here. She is going to edit his interview into whatever makes him look the most suspicious. But to cooperate with someone's who's motives are so blatantly biased is beyond ******ed.
Addicted to Serial? Quote

      
m