yawn

Isn't this just all common sense? What parts surprised you?

This is a commonly held perception unfortunately. It's because of misogynist like phillip who use the study of gender and race differences to substantiate their beliefs that women [and in some cases other races] are inferior. So, all differences and inclinations have to be ignored to preempt any possibility of discrimination along those lines.

Far from being self absorbed time wasting; understanding these differences will benefit everyone from every day things like teaching up to governmental policy decisions.

Pinker's classic book that made him famous was "The Language Instinct" but that has more to do with linguistics. For an overview of evolutionary biology and it's implications you should read "The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature" imo.

I've never read this book. And why would you tell us you have a bunch of pictures of you with cigars in your mouth then not post them

MORE PICS OF WIMMENZ SUCKING ON THINGS!!! imo.

How can a "ask woman stuff" thread turn gay so suddenly?

I never said that women are inferior. Men and women are DIFFERENT and they each have a DIFFERENT ROLE but not necessarily and INFERIOR ROLE. expecting women to do the same job as a man who has twice as much muscle mass as her is dumb. The feminists are so scared of being inferior that they try to force women to be something that they are not.

If a woman wants to have a career then I dont have a problem with that. However, if she wants to fulfill her natural role as a homemaker then no one should make her feel bad about that.

Seriously this thread is full of people who only think with their emotions and are unable to rationally analyze their lives. Wake up people, your ego is not in danger.

On-Topic (apologies for derailing) - How many times a day do you catch men staring at you? Staring at your chest?

You sure have a funny way of putting it.

It is common sense. None of it surprised me.

It does surprise me that any of it surprises anyone else though, and that it can continue to do so for decades. But unfortunately, only a little.

I prefer intellectual discussions to intelecctual ones.

Their egos are not in danger? Dude your audience is very young. They're even terrified to be seen wearing the wrong sneakers or eating an unpopular potato chip flavor.

Well one area that I KNOW women are INFERIOR in is having a SENSE of HUMOUR. it was a misogynistic joke. It must be your time of the month so I can understand if you are touchy right now.

and again a WOMAN resorts to ad hominem attacks. Listen lady I went to private school so I no how to spell. forgive me if I dont have a copy editor for all my posts.

you need to learn a thing or two about logical fallacies, kid. (and also the difference between no and know).

Is ad hominem the only fallacy you know how to cite? Do you know what it is?

So no women really want to work, eh?

"lol women never want to have an intelecctual discussion, instead they want to hang onto false beliefs that only limit their happiness"

oh reallly?

I'd ask for a refund on your tuition.


Argumentum ad hominem (argument directed at the person). This is the error of attacking the character or motives of a person who has stated an idea, rather than the idea itself. The most obvious example of this fallacy is when one debater maligns the character of another debater (e.g, "The members of the opposition are a couple of fascists!"), but this is actually not that common. A more typical manifestation of argumentum ad hominem is attacking a source of information -- for example, responding to a quotation from Richard Nixon on the subject of free trade with China by saying, "We all know Nixon was a liar and a cheat, so why should we believe anything he says?" Argumentum ad hominem also occurs when someone's arguments are discounted merely because they stand to benefit from the policy they advocate -- such as Bill Gates arguing against antitrust, rich people arguing for lower taxes, white people arguing against affirmative action, minorities arguing for affirmative action, etc. In all of these cases, the relevant question is not who makes the argument, but whether the argument is valid.

Ohhhhhh yeah, I knew I didn't like you for a reason apart from your incoherent ramblings in this thread and very, very clever jokes about a smart women being equated to a very intelligent termite. You're the dude who thinks you're smart because you went to a private school instead of a public one.

I bet that when you were in Elementary School you got caught molesting other children and they kicked you out. Then your parents were forced to put you in a private school where they could keep a better eye on you. Am I close?

I wouldn't mind if Mayo just nuked the last ~50 posts in this thread to be honest. Back to the last decent one where Emme was sucking on things.

in after troll ban



<3 mayo, wp

clapping

fffffffffffffffffyyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhhhhh h on that moren ban

might have been beal since he was talking bad about 4l ladies

Hi guys. .

It was Ryan.

EDIT: By Ryan, I mean 4_2_it, of course.

People stare at me/check me out. I don't keep track of how often.

We knew what you meant.

Due to an odd look or attractiveness (I'm not trying to be insulting, just can't tell from the post)? Also, is it basically every day?

I like to think it's because i'm pretty. I'm in college so I basically see the same guys everyday. Although there was this one dude in a writing class that would stare at me all class long and he tracked me down at a party and explained . . . it was on the pretty side not so hideously disgusting looking that i had to stare. if that helps.