Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
***OFFICIAL*** Ask the ladies of 4life any sort of weird/stupid/disgusting question ***OFFICIAL*** Ask the ladies of 4life any sort of weird/stupid/disgusting question

06-09-2009 , 10:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBruiser500
but women are not passive objects that we can mold however we want. in fact the idea is even more devaluing of women than what i say.

why can't we just say "women are different, women want a man to take care of them and they want to have kids. women aren't interested in competing to be the best in their field, to achieve power over many people, to achieve riches, to be the best athlete," - and leave it at that. and men can be proud of what they do, and women can be proud of what they do. i dont' think there has to be anything inherently bad with a woman wanting a man to take care of her, nor is there anything inherently good about a man wanting to make so much money at poker (i dunno, maybe there is)?

to me what is shameful is for a woman to lie about it and act that way. what would be heroic is to tell the truth and accept it, or tell the truth and fight for things the way you want.
you are an ignorant pos if you actually believe that garbage to be true.
06-09-2009 , 10:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBruiser500
but women are not passive objects that we can mold however we want. in fact the idea is even more devaluing of women than what i say.
Right then, you aren't smart.
This goes to the very core of nature vs. Nurture. Or are you going to suggest nurture has nothing to do with anything?


Quote:
why can't we just say "women are different, women want a man to take care of them and they want to have kids. women aren't interested in competing to be the best in their field, to achieve power over many people, to achieve riches, to be the best athlete," - and leave it at that.
Because it's not true?
Quote:
I don't think there has to be anything inherently bad with a woman wanting a man to take care of her, nor is there anything inherently good about a man wanting to make so much money at poker (i dunno, maybe there is)?
Okay, so if this is your point you had to reach it by using language that many women in this forum will find offensive?
I see nothing wrong with a woman who wants to stay at home and raise her children herself. At the same time, I also see nothing wrong with a woman going to school for 12 years to achieve her PhD. My general mantra is live and let live.

Quote:
to me what is shameful is for a woman to lie about it and act that way. what would be heroic is to tell the truth and accept it, or tell the truth and fight for things the way you want.
In this instance the truth isn't really true. It's your opinion.
06-09-2009 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mspoopybutt
I'm just going to throw a wrench in this whole ****ing thing and blow your minds, how about that?????

Women have Testosterone. We just don't have receptors on our testicles for it.
Meh, it's not a wrench. And after menopause women receive more testosterone and less estrogen. Men receive less testosterone and more estrogen. By the time we're 100 we're continuing towards hormonal balance between the sexes.

All eggs are female. What about that!?
06-09-2009 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mspoopybutt
I'm just going to throw a wrench in this whole ****ing thing and blow your minds, how about that?????

Women have Testosterone. We just don't have receptors on our testicles for it.
See, you don´t know how to grow some balls.

And women have a penis, but it´s much smaller than a man´s penis so that means we are better, right?
06-09-2009 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mspoopybutt
Women have Testosterone. We just don't have receptors on our testicles for it.
I remember when I found out there was estrogen in semen during health class in 7th grade. That was weird.
06-09-2009 , 10:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11beatsperminute
See, you don´t know how to grow some balls.

And women have a penis, but it´s much smaller than a man´s penis so that means we are better, right?
Well, our penises are way more sensitive than yours!

Edit to add: we have receptors for testosterone, even if we don't have them in our balls.
06-09-2009 , 10:54 PM
evidently this insight of mine did not have the far-reaching intellectual consequences I'd surmised.
06-09-2009 , 10:55 PM
[x] milk ejection itt
06-09-2009 , 10:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mspoopybutt
evidently this insight of mine did not have the far-reaching intellectual consequences I'd surmised.
I find it more interesting that all babies start out female
06-09-2009 , 10:56 PM
"And there have been women important in sciences. Madame Currie springs to mind. Rosalind Franklin as well who had her brilliance taken away by men during her lifetime."

okay that is two women, and i've never heard of that 2nd genius of yours. perhaps that reflects my ignorance, but i am betting it comes closer to showing the weakness of your evidence. i won't argue that there have been women that have accomplsihed something amazing and moved our civilization forward. but i will say, The amount of women in history that have done something great is HUGELY SMALLER than men. do you want to argue that?

i didn't think i would get such wildly defensive and reactionary responses. so let's start with a more basic question. all you have admitted so far is men and women are physically different and men are stronger. do you think that men and women think the same?

i mean, i can ask questions like this... do you think men and women place the same value on aquiring power? and if not, which places more value on it? ...... which is so basic and obvious as to be insulting to you. but you seem to want it.

"And frankly, if you're going to sit there and pretend that someone couldn't take your post with any sort of negative connotation maybe you're not as smart as I assumed you could be. Though, my guess is you think you're smarter than you are."

you are ******ed. lol i don't think i have seen talk on here like this in a long long time. i'm pretty sure i used a burn like this on someone when i was 16 on the schoolbus against a senior.
06-09-2009 , 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmomo
Well, our penises are way more sensitive than yours!

Edit to add: we have receptors for testosterone, even if we don't have them in our balls.
there've been some studies on testosterone amounts in imprisoned men so i do wonder about imprisoned women and T levels. Uppety bitches.
06-09-2009 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tartufo
[x] milk ejection itt
I'd like to turn into a wet nurse just so I can squirt milk into someones eye on command. Sooooo sexy.
06-09-2009 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gizmomo
Well, our penises are way more sensitive than yours!
"Your penis is bigger, but mine is more sensitive!"

Ask Mayo if you can impress anyone with that.
06-09-2009 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBruiser500
"And there have been women important in sciences. Madame Currie springs to mind. Rosalind Franklin as well who had her brilliance taken away by men during her lifetime."

okay that is two women, and i've never heard of that 2nd genius of yours. perhaps that reflects my ignorance, but i am betting it comes closer to showing the weakness of your evidence. i won't argue that there have been women that have accomplsihed something amazing and moved our civilization forward. but i will say, The amount of women in history that have done something great is HUGELY SMALLER than men. do you want to argue that?

i didn't think i would get such wildly defensive and reactionary responses. so let's start with a more basic question. all you have admitted so far is men and women are physically different and men are stronger. do you think that men and women think the same?

i mean, i can ask questions like this... do you think men and women place the same value on aquiring power? and if not, which places more value on it? ...... which is so basic and obvious as to be insulting to you. but you seem to want it.

"And frankly, if you're going to sit there and pretend that someone couldn't take your post with any sort of negative connotation maybe you're not as smart as I assumed you could be. Though, my guess is you think you're smarter than you are."

you are ******ed. lol i don't think i have seen talk on here like this in a long long time. i'm pretty sure i used a burn like this on someone when i was 16 on the schoolbus against a senior.
The thing you are failing to realize yet is so painfully obvious to everyone is that you are a ****ing idiot who is not making good points, add that to the obvious misogynistic overtones in your "questions" (loaded questions is the correct term) and you should be able to figure out why she took offense to your bull****. Another thing she pointed out was the fact that women as a result of being physically inferior as a majority haven't been given the same rights and opportunities as their male counterparts. Giz used the analogy of why there aren't as many famous black scientists, its because white males have been the dominant majority to which the largest amount of materials and opportunities have been given. In other words, you are a ****ing idiot.
06-09-2009 , 11:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11beatsperminute
"Your penis is bigger, but mine is more sensitive!"

Ask Mayo if you can impress anyone with that.
Hey what if a female used *******. I can't believe I never thought about that before.

Last edited by 172424; 06-09-2009 at 11:03 PM. Reason: stupid male dominated society doesn't even give us the option to make our clits bigger WTF?
06-09-2009 , 11:01 PM
giz, plz to be telling me about the time you rubbed one out in public?
06-09-2009 , 11:03 PM
""Right then, you aren't smart.
This goes to the very core of nature vs. Nurture. Or are you going to suggest nurture has nothing to do with anything? ""

are you suggesting that nature has nothing to do with anything? once again you assigned me a super weak position, that i didn't take, and then attacked it. this is exactly what i am talking about... you are incapable of a logical debate on this subject. why don't you just politely excuse yourself from this and do some gossiping with your buddies? it's not like I go around passionately inserting my artwork into exhibitions claiming that i can do it with everyone else. i mean, maybe as a joke, but in earnest i'd just embarrass myself.
06-09-2009 , 11:04 PM
Bruiser is rich but Gizmo's a hot young blonde. Jeez, I don't know whose ass to kiss.
06-09-2009 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mspoopybutt
Hey what if a female used *******. I can't believe I never thought about that before.
Don´t know. Only a male scientist can find out.

Edit: I heard about sex freak shows with girls presenting giant clits, but frankly never really wanted to know more about it.

Last edited by 11beatsperminute; 06-09-2009 at 11:08 PM. Reason: clits
06-09-2009 , 11:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBruiser500
"And there have been women important in sciences. Madame Currie springs to mind. Rosalind Franklin as well who had her brilliance taken away by men during her lifetime."

okay that is two women, and i've never heard of that 2nd genius of yours. perhaps that reflects my ignorance, but i am betting it comes closer to showing the weakness of your evidence.
This made me laugh in real life, fwiw. She figured out the DNA molecule by herself, only to have her notebook stolen and published without her consent.
She's actually pretty well known, so it does show you're just ignorant.

Trotula of Salerno was an Italian scientist, who is known for her works in the field of obstetrics and gynecology. She taught men about women's health and wrote books, which were used by physicians for hundreds of years. Trotula suggested the theory that men suffered from fertility issues, which was considered controversial then. She even promoted opiates that dulled the pain of labor during childbirth. However, this was opposed by church, which asked women to suffer the pain of childbirth without medication. Trotula was an important figure in the understanding of women's health. Major works: Passionibus Curandorum or The Diseases of Women

Maria Mayer was a German physicist. She is known for determining the shell structure of the atom and the shell configuration, wherein the electrons are positioned. It is her model that is used by most of the teachers within the classroom, to explain the composition of the atom. To the surprise of many, Mayer also assisted on the atomic bomb project and was awarded a Nobel Prize for her contribution in the separation of the isotopes of uranium. Major works: Determining the shell structure of the atom and the shell configuration

Gertrude B. Elien was an American scientist, who lived from 1918 to 1999. She is well known for her contributions in cancer research. Ellien is accredited for discovering many anti-cancer drugs. For her efforts, she was even awarded a Nobel Prize. Major works: Discovery of anti-cancer drugs

Rachel Zimmerman is a Canadian scientist, who invented the Blissymbol Printer. It is a device that allows non-speaking people, such as those afflicted with severe physical disabilities like cerebral palsy, to communicate. It helps the user to correspond with the help of a program by pointing to various symbols on a main page board with a special pad. On touching the symbol, the "Blissymbol Printer" translates them into a written language, which can be communicated via e-mail. Major works: Blissymbol Printer



Quote:
i won't argue that there have been women that have accomplsihed something amazing and moved our civilization forward. but i will say, The amount of women in history that have done something great is HUGELY SMALLER than men. do you want to argue that?
No, I won't argue that men have had more widely and well known accomplishments. But I will also attribute this to the fact that women have been historically oppressed. So the accomplishments we have achieved when, let's say... we weren't even really allowed to learn math in leu of more traditional "woman" knowledge is even more impressive, no?

Quote:
i didn't think i would get such wildly defensive and reactionary responses. so let's start with a more basic question. all you have admitted so far is men and women are physically different and men are stronger. do you think that men and women think the same?

i mean, i can ask questions like this... do you think men and women place the same value on aquiring power? and if not, which places more value on it? ...... which is so basic and obvious as to be insulting to you. but you seem to want it.
I'll answer your question with a question
Do you believe nature plays a bigger role or that nurture in people's lives plays the bigger role in how they think?


Quote:
you are ******ed. lol i don't think i have seen talk on here like this in a long long time. i'm pretty sure i used a burn like this on someone when i was 16 on the schoolbus against a senior.
You may think I'm ******ed, but at least I know who Rosalind Franklin is.
06-09-2009 , 11:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blarg
Bruiser is rich but Gizmo's a hot young blonde. Jeez, I don't know whose ass to kiss.
inorite i just keep trying to impress them both but it's not werkin. Afaik.
06-09-2009 , 11:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayo
I remember when I found out there was estrogen in semen during health class in 7th grade. That was weird.
Whoa, I would have spit it out immediately!
06-09-2009 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11beatsperminute
"Your penis is bigger, but mine is more sensitive!"

Ask Mayo if you can impress anyone with that.
It's pretty much numb anymore tbh.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 11beatsperminute
male scientist
Redundant ldo.
06-09-2009 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylmac85
The thing you are failing to realize yet is so painfully obvious to everyone is that you are a ****ing idiot who is not making good points, add that to the obvious misogynistic overtones in your "questions" (loaded questions is the correct term) and you should be able to figure out why she took offense to your bull****. Another thing she pointed out was the fact that women as a result of being physically inferior as a majority haven't been given the same rights and opportunities as their male counterparts. Giz used the analogy of why there aren't as many famous black scientists, its because white males have been the dominant majority to which the largest amount of materials and opportunities have been given. In other words, you are a ****ing idiot.
This post is not good. ad hominem ftw!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blarg
Whoa, I would have spit it out immediately!
bahahahaahaha. wp sir, wp.
06-09-2009 , 11:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by theBruiser500
""Right then, you aren't smart.
This goes to the very core of nature vs. Nurture. Or are you going to suggest nurture has nothing to do with anything? ""

are you suggesting that nature has nothing to do with anything?
Oh no, not at all. Nature plays less of a role than nurture, though. From my studied perspective that is.

Quote:
you are incapable of a logical debate on this subject. why don't you just politely excuse yourself from this and do some gossiping with your buddies? it's not like I go around passionately inserting my artwork into exhibitions claiming that i can do it with everyone else. i mean, maybe as a joke, but in earnest i'd just embarrass myself.
hmmm. you seem to be the more way more intent on attacking me personally than actually answering my logical points, though. Ie: That societal norms play a role in development of people. Or that oppression of the female gender has a lot to do with our lack of prominence in society...


Quote:
Originally Posted by Blarg
Bruiser is rich but Gizmo's a hot young blonde. Jeez, I don't know whose ass to kiss.
Well, we can assume he has more money than me. However, I doubt it.

      
m