Posted on a Danish poker forums.
Quote:
I can see that many people are unhappy that I have interfered with Sifosis's stake, even though I have not stabbed him. That is fair enough, but when you start seeking stakes for more than $ 100,000 on an open forum, one must also expect that critical issues will be pointed out by forum users.
Here are the relationships that I have pointed out in another thread.
- Missing SharkScope opt-in
- The warning from Walth
- Non-repayment of loans
Missing SharkScope opt-in
https://www.pokernet.dk/forum/sifosi...il.html#newest # 792
Sifosis wrote 17-03-2020 14:33:
"For info, I just asked for the opening of my sharkscope so stakers can follow the numbers there and see that things fit. How long it will take before it opens, I don't know."
Siphos wrote 19-03-2020 16:34
"As mentioned in the latest thread, I have also requested the opening of my sharkscope so that the numbers can be checked. I got the answer below two days ago, so there may be some time before it is open, but unless otherwise the numbers can be checked shortly.
Hello Allan,
Welcome to Stars Support! I hope this email finds you well.
We allow players to easily opt in to the various third party results websites, while still protecting their identity.
We will submit your request to the website you mention and expect this to be resolved in the next 10-14 days at the latest.
Thank you for your patience, and please let us know if you need further assistance.
Regards
Mariana
Stars Support "
KJNKalle wrote 29-04-2020 17:46
"(...)
Why are you not opted into Sharkscope?
It could provide a pretty bold transparency. "
Siphos wrote 29-04-2020 18:03
"(...)
I had actually ordered opt-in to the shark, but the treatment took so long that I couldn't get it open before driving myself again a few days, so I just withdrew it. I would like to open again, and we will see how soon they can open
"
Paymakerdk 30-04-2020 09:52
"By the way, I would greatly appreciate an opt-in on sharkscope or any other way you can track it
"
Since then, many have asked why he is not opt-in. But he has not been interested in answering that.
The warning from Walth
Walth wrote 19-03-2020 16:28
"A friend made me aware of this thread, I have to advise people to give OP money.
In short, I borrowed OP some money a few years ago against getting them again when he hit Supernova Elita and thus wanted to get a payout. The problem was that he had promised several people this solution and when the OP hit SNE, there was not enough money to pay off all creditors. "
https://www.pokernet.dk/forum/staked...ml#post4337231 # 57
Non-repayment of loan
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/6...ut3ihbzsMYWFXQ
https://twitter.com/qihu00/status/1265103203609325569
The following has emerged:
- That backers have asked for an overview of deposits and disbursements. The OP has not been interested in that since, in his opinion, it will be more confusing than beneficial.
- Several users have stated that OP has been a poor payer.
After all this came up, Bridge decided to create this thread. I think that was the only thing to do. He should be praised for that.
Much of this could have been avoided if the OP had been honest. When you want to be staked for so much money, it is appropriate to state that you have a history of non-performing loans. In addition, one must also be willing to provide documentation in the form of ShakScope opt-in and summary of deposits and withdrawals from one's star account. Especially when backers demand it.