Hey everyone,
Quote:
Originally Posted by cr1t1cal
Instead of handing out the Platinum Pass to the first prize winner in some of these tournaments, why not make them random? Something like "one random winner will receive a Platinum Pass during the first hour of play".
Maybe also hand out passes for the PCA for other tournaments, and not just the main event.
Not all of the passes are awarded to winners of tournaments. For instance, any player who played a Winter Series Event was eligible to join an all-in shootout for a package (yes, technically a tournament, but not really!). There's a lot of different ways to win a package, ranging from doing very little, to cashing in two tournaments on the same day and winning a freeroll, to winning a tournament with 60K+ entrants. We've created a tab in the Events lobby so that players can keep track of what promotions are on for PSPC at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlowlyMovin
Is there a reason for not having the daily marathon as early/late edition aswell?
Majors fatigue! I think it works in its current timeslot since it is available for our biggest markets and it also helped filled a gap in the schedule. There's no plans to change the Majors schedule at the moment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mecantplay
Luke, do you think that this series was successful with 4 tiers tourneys especially adding micro tier? If so, it will be nice if all series have 4 tiers. Like if i have the money to play micro mtt i can play them and satellite to low editions. There is no way if i do not have the gold to try to satellite to medium events so from my pov they do not cannibalize. Before when there was 3 tier i could play lets say up to 11$ and i had to satellite to 27$ so i missed some events. It is true that very rarely i satellited to 109/215$ and the filling to play big event was nice, but ultimately it is way better to have 4 tier mtt series so all players can play.
Overall, Winter Series went pretty well, but I want to mention up front that
Turbo Series will not be tiered. With that in mind, if you wanted to satellite into the Turbo Series Main Event, what would you be looking for?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cznsnowy91
Glad there will be some version of TCOOP .
It was always the plan!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 7OAD
Wow thanks for the quick response!
I honestly expected you to say "ok cool, I'll run it by my team" and then for me to bug you about it a month later and you to say "still deciding."
This is fantastic customer service! And I'm not just saying that because you adopted "my" ideas, it's more so the fact that these ideas are obviously very innocuous and in no way can harm anything company related and the fact that you guys are open to harmless and clearly good (ok pumping my tires here a bit) ideas shows why you guys are industry leaders in being able to integrate feedback in real time and not muddling around twiddling your thumbs.
If I may continue:
Not to get greedy, actually **** it I'm a poker player, let's get greedy. Any way that you can add rebuys to the 545 zoom as well? (Same reasoning as above)
In regards to the satellites, is there any way you guys can add voucher satellites i.e $5/10/15/25/55 vouchers? I really am not a fan of the current satellite system as someone who multitables, I cannot play the ones that I really want if I'm going deep in a few tournaments and the satellite (non hyper) is starting. There are lulls in my schedule where I usually end up 2-3 tabling and it would be very easy for me to get in some good extra volume by firing these up and I would love to do it (I'm sure many others feel the same considering the comments ITT), but these tournies do not exist and I do not see why not
Any way you guys can add some hypers or even mega hyper (1 minute blinds) zooms? The "turbo" zoom really acts as a "deep" tournament due to the fact that most can play about 3 hands per minute thus putting them at the same volume as a 15 minute blind table. I would love to see some in the $1-10 range, but I think even your high stakers would love to see some higher ones that can be effectively done for them in 20-30 minutes on average and they can still put in good volume with them.
Looking forward to hearing your feedback.
Thanks for the kind words. I'm sure I'll do something in the future to make you wish you could edit your post.
On a more serious note, it is important to realize that my (and any other site representative's) day-to-day varies considerably. If I go silent for a week or more, it could mean there is not much to say, that I'm out of the office, or that my attention is required elsewhere. It may seem like things only happen in short bursts, and in a way that's true, but it is because we have many responsibilities not visible here, not because of a lack of caring.
Anyways, back to poker! As for your three suggestions:
- Let's see how the other change to the Zoom MTT works out first.
- I've mentioned here a few times that satellites are difficult. We want the money to go into the target, but we also want players to have flexibility in terms of when they get to play. Since we typically do not have short expiry periods on player-funded tickets, the result is that many players do not feel pressured to use them. That's why, at the moment, we tend to force players to play the target from the start. I'd like to look for a good opportunity to test some type of series-contained satellite system. Any suggestions?
- The issue here is determining what to call them, as silly as that seems. We currently tag 5 to 6 minute blinds as "turbo" in both Zoom and regular tournaments, though clearly more hands are played in Zoom. Perhaps we should start with trying hyper-turbo Zoom tournaments and see how they perform.
Quote:
Originally Posted by twiyPRO
Since Winter Series was a huge sucess with one of the best schedules ever (except for the fact that we didn't had mixed events), will be too optmistic to think PokerStars will put 4 different tiers in this events?
I mean... High, Medium, Low, Micro for each event?
Please say yes?
Not for Turbo Series, but SCOOP will of course be tiered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Re8uZ
@luke i have one idea about transferring funds...
can you add option for people to buy T$ with real $(even with those real $ that one cant withdraw) and then transfer those T$ to other player/s ??
Though I'm not an expert, I don't think regulatory bodies would see this any differently from transferring real money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlyn M
You don't say...
Thanks for pointing this out. We'll make sure it doesn't happen next time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by travisohc
played yesterday and the 11+ which starts alongside the Big109 was gone. Is there a specific reason?
Received one of these „Pokerstars Winning Moments“-Videos and I kinda liked it (and I‘m sure recs do too). The choice of hands shown seems pretty random though!
Regarding Tcoop and other Series:
Please at least consider giving back the winners of each event some kind of additional prize.
Bracelets and watches have been nice, or do a Tournament of Champions that awards Platinum Passes/Live or Online Event entries.
Receiving a bottle of Champagne like on Winamax is just a nice gesture and makes the winners experience even better!
- The $11+R was removed due to poor participation.
- What was random about it? It is actually a pretty cool algorithm that determines which hands are the most exciting. What would you change about the videos?
- Thank you for your feedback.
Quote:
Originally Posted by reraise85
+ 1 to tiered tcoop
Also after a successful winter series could u not do like a golf/tennis 4 majors a year, tcoop (if it has to be turbo) scoop, wcoop and winter series all with 3 levels low medium high or 4 if can include micro. Give out rings/bracelet/ live event package to people that complete a grand slam (win an event in each series, not the same year that would be ridic difficult) Players would know what was happening at the same rough dates and all stakes would get at least 4 major series to play each year?
Well, we're doing a bit of the opposite with TCOOP (by rebranding it Turbo Series). We have other plans later in the year that hopefully explain this a bit more clearly, but to me a suite of turbo tournaments should not be so serious!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Transcendence
Ahh my favourite thread is still running? Good to be back
Welcome
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTXR1
How can you run such a big event like the Winter Series and not include any Mixed Games? Not even PLO8!?
You really must hate variety.
As I've mentioned, the scope for Winter Series was a bit limited. The next time around, it is possible that a wider range of games is offered.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayme87
Actually, this is for my team! Thanks for posting, it has been corrected.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danshiel350
Returned from a large break and liquidity in steps SnG's is even lower than it was in the past.
Is there anything to lose by making these 6 max?
I've passed on your suggestion, thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJAcesRule
Luke,
A small one, but a bit annoying.
Couple months back they changed the latereg time for the Bigs to two hours instead of like a 130 minutes. This is fine, but it is still showing the messages of the old ending time.. For example I am just getting the message that latereg for Big 16.5 is closing while it closed about 10 minutes ago. Can you pass this on to the right people to fix it.
Thanks.
This is also for my team. We've fixed it as of approximately one hour ago. Thank you very much for this - a bit difficult for us to find but probably also unbelievably frustrating for players.