Can anyone here confirm that having a very fast computer will not help against the lag and client crashing issues on stars with aurora? Was trying 16+ tables and my tables literally froze along with HEM3 and starscaption. Starscaption crashed multiple times and so did HEM3. Then even when I open the stars client again and log in, the tables take a long time to load and even if they load, they are frozen for a long time and then you get sat out the entire time unless some of your tables bust... so say if you now have 12 or less tables, it seem only then does the tables load correctly.



Does having a very fast computer mean you will still have these issues regardless? My laptop is an old dell xps 15 9550 with specs of


i5-6300hq
1tb ssd
8gb ram upgraded to 32gb ram



Even with 32gb ram, I still have these issues. Aurora setting should be low or high? Or does it depend on someone's computer? Also, do you need to set your video card to be your faster one? Recall a while back you had that setting change where you change your graphics for aurora... would that work now or not?



My graphics cards seem to be


Intel (R) HD Graphics 530
NVidia GEForce GTX 960M



I believe it uses the Intel (R) HD Graphics 530 as the primary but sometimes it changes to the NVidia GeForce when it is using lot of cpu? So do I make all my programs run the NVidia GEForce GTX 960M as oppose to the Intel? But this graphic card is still very old right?



Also if it matters, I use 2 monitors, one is a 32' 4k monitor and the other is a 24' 1920x1200 monitor. Is it possible using 2 different monitors with 2 different resolution could also be causing these lags? I assume not since many people use multiple monitors with different resolutions? Because stars is literally unplayable if you want to run HEM3 and starscaption and say you want to play 12+ tables. Back then before aurora, I remember 20 tabling even with HEM2 and rarely any lag at all.