Quote:
Originally Posted by DoGGz
Because he wants to play a 5% rake freezeout where a bunch of other people added bonus money to the prizepool. We all know this. No reason to leave it an open question.
i prefer a standardized investment in said tournaments day in and day out with no variation, and low rake. nothing about staggering benefits the recs, pros or party, everyone loses. you've got 10 regs who thinks its good because it prevents people like me from gaining an imaginary advantage, so well done. shoot yourself in the foot and force a smaller prize pool that will eventually dwindle to nothing
or maybe ive missed something, has the meta changed and the deepest pocketed regs playing the most hands (from start) no longer have the biggest advantage?
its also really weird that you make that statement as if its a bad thing, its what rebuys are all about. people like DN dropping a bazzilion rebuys in the wsop 1kr, and jo schmo truck driver giving it a shot on 1-2k for a massive roi thanks to his donations. or elky and anette shipping blind every hand for an hour in the 100r, then andres from venezuela seeing the prize pool blowup and take a shot. why would you EVER be in favor of eliminating ANY participation at all is just headasplode
Last edited by coinflipper; 05-19-2016 at 09:39 PM.