dude, not a word in your post makes sense....
Think they will try hire you at Party Poker, you would fit for sure

don't Forget the micro area plz.

more 2,2/3,3 - 5,5 buy ins would be nice...more 8max (or 9handed)

you dont Need reduce the gtd...allways...a buy in Change could help too.
example: the big bounty hunter 19cet. 1,1 buy in 2,5k gtd. (i know i said it but i try it again) Change it to 3,3 buy in please- or as a compromise to 2,2 buy in. would be much more atractive. and it would hit the gtd -if not from day1 then after a short while...im sure.
(the at the same time starting 5,5 buy in 10k gtd is a nice tournament)- maybe i shouldnt say that maybe it's gone tomorrow...

the ONLY game/ tournamnet i played in THE LAST WEEKS was the 100k gtd 11 buy in yesterday....

over the day i absolut dont like it! in the evening i would have a few Options...but thats mostly to late for me...sundays obv better-but not much..so i think im done with online poker or what...

Wow, I just read that back myself and you're totally right.

Please ignore the tilty drunk guy... carry on.

LOL, it actually strangely made sense to me
Withdrawals can only be reversed in full, I'm not 100% sure why however this is the only option
For further account issues regarding deposits/withdrawals, the customer service team are by far best placed to advise

Thanks

Colette

at least bring back the :30 turbos, there is nothing to play on Party. ffs

please this.

So this is where you are getting "players feedback" for constant last minute changes on scheduled MTTS, blind structure, type, GTD, etc etc??
while i dont see any problems with benefits as above that are given to stables(even bigger % of rakeback)... i do see big problem when bunch of players decide ("give feedback") what they think is "best" and that is in the client without any upfront notice/announcement to other players (or asked feedback from)

+1 ty for this post - totaly true.

i read that in the other thread and was wondering(was i really?.) and asked ~that too there....but get no answer...with this open said things you can make your own puzzle...

hopeless! what a waste of time it was...playing there+ giving Feedback here!

Colette could you please explain why this is? Can you see why one of the biggest sites that do not run $22s might look ridiculous?

So true, in other threads there is a back and forth discussion about what changes should be made and why, here we just see some random change in the lobby, i can't remember requests for mix max yet the lobby is full of it.

The schedule is miles behind other sites, its crazy.

I just find it amazing that I can play games between $5-25 across 10 sites and the second biggest in the world is the one where I have put in the second least volume this month. The game selection is so stale, the games are tougher than almost anywhere else, the $11fo flagship today took 4 1/2 hours to get itm and the 2x re-entries have slipped back in. Oh and there are practically no $22 games. Reading and posting in this thread is a true Groundhog Day experience.

hey,
i personally like the deep structures, but please don't call any of these tournaments fast/turbo because it is very misleading

some creativity in naming the tournaments wouldnt hurt either

also, i dont really see the point of having color labels but not showing them in the lobby, but i guess you dont want ppl to see that all the mtts are regfests before regging, so that might make sense

if you get PartyCaption you can have labels seen in the lobby, but that's third party software.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Re8uZ

So this is where you are getting "players feedback" for constant last minute changes on scheduled MTTS, blind structure, type, GTD, etc etc??

They never said anything about their other sources ....
But they not competent enough to have proper qualitative or quantitative panels...anyway from where... bunch of UK dudes from DTD... yuuuk

Guess sadly stables have the final word...main reason their sats are only designed to feed 109 and 215 events.

The big things with BRS will explode soon (i know 3 guys ex BRS that have graphs and documents to back up in case they deny)

the thing is, this thread is a waste of time, who are we giving our feedback too? Colette does not deal with the schedule. If other people within the team are reading this thread then i really wonder why they are not doing anything about the complaints which are almost daily.

The fact there are so little options to play on the site is shocking, if i want to play peak time, there are only 3-4 tournaments on offer, and this is over the whole night lol. For the second biggest site, this is unacceptable. Please understand there is just so very little options for us on the site.

Colette if you do not actually deal with the schedule then why are you the rep on this thread? I'm not having a go, you are very responsive, but i'm just saying it like it is, i think it should be someone who literally makes the changes to the schedule.

The feedback does not come solely from the player panel
We also gather feedback from various groups and forums and our live events, which I have stated previously


Noted
Further improvements regarding the note function are planned in future release updates - the ability to show notes in the lobby is on the to do list


I collate the feedback from all sources - 2+2, other poker forums, feedback from the players via email/CS/social media/live events and our community group forums
This is shared regularly with the poker team management for review and consideration
I also work with the tech teams to share issues and feedback
No, I do not personally deal with the schedule, however, I work alongside the team who do
I have managed player feedback for many years in the same manner including posting as party rep to ensure feedback is noted and reviewed
Why am I the rep? - because of all the above
Your opinion is noted, however, this is unlikely to change in the near future
If you feel I am failing to share your feedback you are of course welcome to share via email

Thanks

Colette

Hi Colette,

You missed this one. Please reply. Thanks.

no, i do not think you are failing to share feedback at all. My issue is the feedback that you do share from this thread is so rarely used. I also believe it would be better to converse with a sole individual who makes changes to a schedule. Look at the MPN thread, that is how it should be done. The rep is literally looking for suggestions, making the changes and explaining why, none of that happens in this case.

I think party would be a lot better if some of the suggestions on here were taken. If you gain feedback from the other sources, great, but the changes on party do not seem to come from here, it is why i question the purpose of this thread.

on top of all this, the game offerings are just so poor, but you do not deal with the schedule, so it is quite strange to tell you about the offerings. We are giving you feedback, it is not used, what do you want from us?

Maybe you can explain some other things,

why are there no $22s at peak time?
why are only a few tournaments spread over many hours which leaves so little for us to play?
why are tournaments repeated so often?

The whole structure of this schedule you have is way below standard, you need someone to rip it up and start over.

I have no comment
If/when it's addressed it will be done on the relevant thread
I have answered concerns previously some time ago regarding the same accusations and believe my comments are likely posted in the thread

I searched the thread and this is all I could find unless someone can point me to the earlier posts alluded to

how can BRS maintain a fund and be able to directly transfer the PPL$ of their players? this option is unavailable for everybody else. This isn't between the stable and their players. Somebody higher had to give access....


also why bother contacting the stable owner directly, they've gone completely MIA. after skimming through 82 pages of the UK LLCP it also seems Party is liable for the 3rd parties they collaborate with. so I think it is more than fair players take up the issue with them in hopes of resolution.

Me waiting for Party to add $22 MTTs at peak hours.

I will provide an answer to this by the weekend.

I will have to be the one to recant this statement prior to November 1st. Just points 1 and 2. I do believe Party will make a statement though.

I am not enjoying the MTTs on this site. the balances are way to high (100k chips) and the blind structure is very weird. also i find it annoying somebody can join 2 hours late and only need 1 double up to have tournament average stack. for such medicore prize pools i would like faster tournaments than this.

This.

Inviato dal mio LEX626 utilizzando Tapatalk