Quote:
Originally Posted by alberthofmann
Hey, either rename the "fast" structured mtts or change the structure, caus i know one thing for sure, they are not fast. A fast, therefore turbo mtt, shouldnt take 7-8 hours with 600 runners.
thx
completely agree, this was said already several times, a 5min Smooth is like a 8min regular game, which was faster than their 10-14min Games but it is still not "fast". I would count it as regular game.
5-7Min Regular Games
4min Fast
3min Turbo
2min Hyper
1 exceptions are 530+ Games, as player fields are way smaller min-lvl can be higher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimyJamonas
Is there gonna be a powerfest/other series running around the millions online or it's a solo event?
Starting 19 November there is a KO-Series coming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MangeTaSueur
the more you talk, the more i realize you are on pills or more...
I play even harder against people i know and not softer, why would they softplay each other?
1- BECAUSE THEY CAN LADDER TO TOP 3 PAID POSITIONS WHERE BIG $ ARE.
PERSONAL INTEREST AND STABLE INTEREST.
2- SHARING INFOS : WTF ! MESSENGER ! SKYPE ! IN WHICH WORLD ARE YOU LIVING.
IF YOU HOLD AK AND YOU KNOW IN A 3 BET POT SOMEONE FOLD A5o AND LET S SAY 66....(extreme case) WHAT DO YOU FEAR ON a A610 FLOP ? YOU OPPONENT IS WAY MORE LIKELY TO BLUFF OR THE COMBOS THAT BEAT YOU ARE JUST 1 OR 2....
THAT S WHY THEY CAN TALK TO EACHOTHER IF THEY HAVE TO PLAY THE SAME GAMES.
3- CHIP DUMPING IF ONE IS SHORT ? STEALING EQUITY ON 3 WAY ALL INS . NOT POSSIBLE AT ALL AT YOUR EYES...F>>>K
Yes, you can still win anyway, but the fact that an ambassador of the site is involved is completely ****ed up.
1) To ladder and play conservative vs other regs is within the nature of ICM and not a specific Stable thing.
So how many Stable players can ladder to the top3 spot? 3 right?
Stable Interest: Imo your view is to narrow, Stables are operating on a different view imo. Their work is coaching and making players better and the money will come from this alone.
2) Your first Assumptions is right, eveyone who knows each other could share those informations regardless of stables or not.
Take Vienna f.e , there are 50-100 Regs here and people are living together. I would know several players at my tables but why should i put the work into it to write them on skype to get informations and so on?
Thats a ****ton of work and nobody is doing this within your regular session, it takes so much focus from your other tables away. First i need somebody willing to share those informations, then the effort to execute this all, while playing maximum tables.
If i am deep in an MTT's your assumtions are valid, everyone who knows somebody at the table could potentially share informations. Do you think within a stable of 100 Players everyone knows everyone and everyone is happy to share their Hands while running deep with a different person only bc they are together in a stable? You will always have some players close related which can share informations, is this happening? Probably to some extend-yes. It is specific for stables and are stables pushing for this behaviur-no!
3) So if i am in a Stable i have a contract with my stable owner and not with other players within the stable. So i am a bigstack in a deeprun and someone of my stable is short, why would i want him to be in the Game, i take care that he will bust as the game will become way better for me`? Why would i give Equity from my stack to somebody else, only bc he is in my stable? Assume i give him chips which are woth 100$, do i get now 100$ from him or will he do the same next time? It is just not working like what....
Stealing Equity 3 handed and that collusion is possible at ALL TIMES is ofc a problem but not a stable secific one. Thats a problem of a small REG-Playerbase which is well-connected after 5-10 years of playing. Is Cheating happening- absolutely but it is more a problem if people knowing each other for long-times and not bc they are playing i a stable. A stable could help connect people- sure.
4) Your assumption that Pads is doing this for his stable is just wrong, the more you repeat it doesn't make it true.