One thing i've realized over my first 3k hands of NL is how much more your 'reads' are going to cost you. It's
nothing like limit play in this regard. We have 68 hands on this player and I do not believe this is enough history to have any clue about his tendencies to bluff with air against a preflop raiser UTG. I believe my largest leak comes after my c-bets start getting raised up a lot and I start getting antsy about it and play back at them more than I should. Add in a little bit of tilt and I just start making ridiculous decisions. If I were to go through my hands I think it would show i'm losing quite a bit when I make big calls on flops like this one.
But back to the hand... we have the As and one of the Q so hands like KQ/JQ are a bit less likely here, we don't have enough history to give too much weight to his bluffing with complete air. The more likely hands are sets, draws, and pp's like TT's. So we're about 55% to win here against that range of hands. Clearly, going all in on the flop, like Alo put it is absolutely terrible. He is still getting correct odds to call if he has a hand like 5/6 because he's getting 42% equity to call.
Quote:
By betting the turn you are pretty much telling him what you have and letting him play perfectly vs you.
Quote:
If you take the line I suggest then you will sometimes let him make his flush, but since we've already discounted the flush hands a bit I'm not quite so worried about that. You lose less vs sets (what do you do if he calls your turn bet and the river bricks? If he does that with a set then you are losing a good size bet on the river too) and still get to see a showdown versus lots of hands you beat.
Well, if he was bluffing how likely is it he's going to continue to bluff on the turn given that Hero opened UTG and called the flop raise? When you call the flop it makes it less likely that he'll continue to bluff on this turn and really the only thing you're doing is letting him have a free card IF he has the flush. If he raises the turn here I think it's an easy fold. If he calls the turn I think you can fire again if no spade drops.
I'm not raising the flop because if he has a draw he's still getting correct odds to call even if we go all in here, but by calling the flop I feel I have to bet the turn - again, because of the draw possibility. Betting the turn is good but Hero probably should have bet the pot or slightly over. We want him to call the turn without proper odds if he's on a draw. If he raises it's an easy fold. We can't check raise because then we'll be giving him the correct odds to call. Although I guess it's good that we got him to incorrectly bet out on the turn...
The essential question I think is how Aggro are the opponents? Has the avg player evolved to the point where raising C-bets w/ air on these kinds of boards is happening often enough for us to have to take more stands? How much weight can we give to his aggression? I mean, we're 55% to win here given the range we are putting him on... but does his aggression mean that we need to tighten up his range and give him more credit for a big hand? How often do these players even bet their draws?