Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
I don't mean morally uncomfortable, I mean "playing the game well" uncomfortable. Every time you highlight the fact that you're a successful wolf, you are diminishing the confidence of everyone who has read you as a villager. So, if they were correct, their correct read erodes a bit when they're reminded "oh yeah, Zaya could just be owning me." So I try to let people worry about that on their own, rather than encourage it, when I'm a villager.
When I'm a wolf I don't want to talk about it because of the above. It's really nice to be honest about it, but sort of self-defeating, imo.
Thus, in that sense, I'm always uncomfortable with that situation. Apparently it doesn't bother you at all, which is fine. Just trying to get an understanding of that approach.
I guess, like I said though my games are so markedly different and I'm such an obvious villager when I am one that I don't think about that part.
It seems like I always get peeked when I'm a wolf, because people like my posts but there is niggling doubt because I'm not villa enough like they are used to. Plus I suck at seer hunting, so I never kill them fast enough not to be peeked. However, I'm rarely peeked when I'm villa cause I'm so obvious villa. I am however early NK'd LOTS, and I always play the most pro-villa way possible so I'm obvious villager. I guess I don't see the problem.
As Sun has told me, my villager game is unduplicatable. He's right, but I'm not going to sacrifice my villa game for my wolf game. I still play a good wolf game, but really truly they are very different if you read them. Mets would have caught me last game, except he put too much faith in his "tell". I knew what his tell was for me, so I was very careful to avoid it. Sun would have caught me, but he was my partner... MrG and Homer did catch me, but I worked around that.