Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict

07-12-2012 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan
So

Gimmicks?
any time somebody mods a game they should be required to specify gimmicks allowed y/n

all in favor say yay
07-12-2012 , 01:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowens
...If you stop it here, it will go back to the pub...
yeah prob

not sure why the effort to control discussion is needed, but whatevs...
07-12-2012 , 01:59 PM
merge thread with pub
07-12-2012 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
any time somebody mods a game they should be required to specify gimmicks allowed y/n

all in favor say yay
This is a good solution. Right now people may be nervous or afraid to disallow them because they would be the only ones. Make it part of the standard game creation. Size, theme, setup, gimmicks, etc.
07-12-2012 , 02:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
any time somebody mods a game they should be required to specify gimmicks allowed y/n

all in favor say yay
I'd be fine with this so count me as a yay.
07-12-2012 , 02:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin
yeah prob

not sure why the effort to control discussion is needed, but whatevs...
+1

just let convo flow on instead of trying to prohibit certain topics. if anybody gets out of hand ban them, otherwise it should be harmless.
07-12-2012 , 02:02 PM
magic specifically denied t he fact that he was a gimmick on numbers. that's almost a whole nuther level, beyond the standard gimmick controversy.
07-12-2012 , 02:02 PM
No gimmicks allowed in any future games I run (turboes excepted)
07-12-2012 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiitch
No gimmicks allowed in any future games I run (turboes excepted)
07-12-2012 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swiitch
No gimmicks allowed in any future games I run (turboes excepted)
+1, tho I would let Mets to play under gimmick.
07-12-2012 , 02:05 PM
while we are talking about bans can we go ahead and knock a couple of long overdue ones out of the way? In order of importance we should ban:

1. Pony pictures, videos, drawings, names, etc.
2. People who post the above
3. Systolic (for many many actions far worse than magic_jizz's actions over a much longer period of time)
4. mets (same as above, but with more volume and more people in his corner so it may take longer for the butthurt to clear)


If we get through all of that then we can look into gimmicks. I do not support the ban of gimmicks unless it is a forum ban rather than a WW ban. Posting on a gimmick should either be allowed or disallowed, not allowed in the forum, but not certain games. If they are banned I would be fine permabanning gimmick accounts and issuing temp bans that increase in length to anyone that posts using a gimmick.
07-12-2012 , 02:06 PM
1/2 should be totally at the game mod's discretion imo. I will never ban someone from doing something awesome like a video or posting what they want within the forum rules/general game integrity rules in one of my games.
07-12-2012 , 02:06 PM
calleddownlight, why so perturbed?
07-12-2012 , 02:06 PM
Dunno why magic_gazz even wants to stay around here

I've played a game in SE and I have hosted a game mainly for SE in POG
Both experiences were not entirely positive - which probably was partly my fault.

So there will be no further initiative from my part to relate with SE

If I were magic_gazz, I would just leave the community in which I do not feel welcome.
07-12-2012 , 02:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
while we are talking about bans can we go ahead and knock a couple of long overdue ones out of the way? In order of importance we should ban:

1. Pony pictures, videos, drawings, names, etc.
2. People who post the above
3. Systolic (for many many actions far worse than magic_jizz's actions over a much longer period of time)
4. mets (same as above, but with more volume and more people in his corner so it may take longer for the butthurt to clear)


If we get through all of that then we can look into gimmicks. I do not support the ban of gimmicks unless it is a forum ban rather than a WW ban. Posting on a gimmick should either be allowed or disallowed, not allowed in the forum, but not certain games. If they are banned I would be fine permabanning gimmick accounts and issuing temp bans that increase in length to anyone that posts using a gimmick.
Systo has been a model ww player for some time now

I haven't had a banner 6 months and I'm sorry you would like me banned
07-12-2012 , 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
while we are talking about bans can we go ahead and knock a couple of long overdue ones out of the way? In order of importance we should ban:

1. Pony pictures, videos, drawings, names, etc.
2. People who post the above
3. Systolic (for many many actions far worse than magic_jizz's actions over a much longer period of time)
4. mets (same as above, but with more volume and more people in his corner so it may take longer for the butthurt to clear)


If we get through all of that then we can look into gimmicks. I do not support the ban of gimmicks unless it is a forum ban rather than a WW ban. Posting on a gimmick should either be allowed or disallowed, not allowed in the forum, but not certain games. If they are banned I would be fine permabanning gimmick accounts and issuing temp bans that increase in length to anyone that posts using a gimmick.
CDL for mod as long as we're talking about ww bans
07-12-2012 , 02:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
while we are talking about bans can we go ahead and knock a couple of long overdue ones out of the way? In order of importance we should ban:

1. Pony pictures, videos, drawings, names, etc.
2. People who post the above
3. Systolic (for many many actions far worse than magic_jizz's actions over a much longer period of time)
4. mets (same as above, but with more volume and more people in his corner so it may take longer for the butthurt to clear)


If we get through all of that then we can look into gimmicks. I do not support the ban of gimmicks unless it is a forum ban rather than a WW ban. Posting on a gimmick should either be allowed or disallowed, not allowed in the forum, but not certain games. If they are banned I would be fine permabanning gimmick accounts and issuing temp bans that increase in length to anyone that posts using a gimmick.
And now, this thread has jumped the shark.

Come on, CDL.
07-12-2012 , 02:08 PM
The pony pictures are really really awful

Are you guys eight year olds, or are you just trying to be "hip" by posting them? I watched an episode of that show and it was truly terrible.
07-12-2012 , 02:08 PM
1. no
2. no
3. no
4. no

also it's basically completely infeasible to ban gimmick accounts from POG generally speaking. and gimmick/anon ww games are fun

I think a continuing discussion about gimmicks and ww is fine though. The ultimate problem though is going to be that there's not enough consensus to justify a rule different then the current one, i.e that it's up to game mods. I think a section in the sticky about when people have to disclose them and so on is a no brainer at the moment. I'm not sure about going further then that. But definitely I support game mods banning them if they like, and forum mod supported enforcement of those game mod decisions
07-12-2012 , 02:09 PM
bsball, why do you get to decide what people can post?
07-12-2012 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabethebabe
...So there will be no further initiative from my part to relate with SE...
the difference is that you're still welcome in SE.

but i totally understand if you want no further part of that relationship.
07-12-2012 , 02:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
while we are talking about bans can we go ahead and knock a couple of long overdue ones out of the way? In order of importance we should ban:

1. Pony pictures, videos, drawings, names, etc.
2. People who post the above
3. Systolic (for many many actions far worse than magic_jizz's actions over a much longer period of time)
4. mets (same as above, but with more volume and more people in his corner so it may take longer for the butthurt to clear)


If we get through all of that then we can look into gimmicks. I do not support the ban of gimmicks unless it is a forum ban rather than a WW ban. Posting on a gimmick should either be allowed or disallowed, not allowed in the forum, but not certain games. If they are banned I would be fine permabanning gimmick accounts and issuing temp bans that increase in length to anyone that posts using a gimmick.
I can hear your whining from all the way over here
07-12-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
1. no
2. no
3. no
4. no

also it's basically completely infeasible to ban gimmick accounts from POG generally speaking. and gimmick/anon ww games are fun

I think a continuing discussion about gimmicks and ww is fine though. The ultimate problem though is going to be that there's not enough consensus to justify a rule different then the current one, i.e that it's up to game mods. I think a section in the sticky about when people have to disclose them and so on is a no brainer at the moment. I'm not sure about going further then that. But definitely I support game mods banning them if they like, and forum mod supported enforcement of those game mod decisions
07-12-2012 , 02:10 PM
I plan on joining the pony party as it clearly gets the haters mad
07-12-2012 , 02:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bsball8806
CDL for mod as long as we're talking about ww bans
If everyone wants me to quit pog we

Make a thread
A pole

Users 1 year or moar
At least 2 long games or 5 turboes

I'll abide by any ruling

I don't want to play if everybody doesn't want me too

When I go 2 months without playing I get spammed in

But I love you guys

So if you want to ban me from ww make a thraad

Make sure all votes are public

      
m