WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict - Page 28 - Puzzles and Other Games Forum

I had a rule that was supposed to help phone posters in HP3 (no spoilers except for pictures and all pictures had to be posted in spoilers) so people could load pages and stuff. About 20 people broke the rule on d1 and there wasnt much I could do. People just refuse to make playing from a phone or work an equal footing to playing with full comp access.

07-12-2012 , 02:22 PM

#677

Eurotrash

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 26,314

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anarchist

yeah buddy

see I had some compassion when i thought it was just a random dude who ****ed up, but it makes me rage knowing that the guy who prevented one of the moast epic woalf stylings OAT is the now-#1-with-a-bullet POG cheesedick

i can't be bothered to read the 600 odd poasts in the middle of this thread but i assume 70% is crossnerd crowing, lolz

07-12-2012 , 02:23 PM

#678

Hurp Durpington

Owlpert

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 32,509

what sort of posts arent viewable on phone?

title peeks? white texts? spoilers?

serious question

07-12-2012 , 02:23 PM

#679

well named

poorly undertitled

Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 78,077

euro you may need to read POG republic or perhaps the last anon draft game before you claim #1 moast epic woalf stylings OAT

07-12-2012 , 02:24 PM

#680

Anarchist

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Mar 2009 Posts: 75,871

i never got why ppl put death reveals in spoilers. it makes no sense

07-12-2012 , 02:24 PM

#681

Henrik Sedin

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 17,915

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eurotrash

...i can't be bothered to read the 600 odd poasts in the middle of this thread but i assume 70% is crossnerd crowing, lolz

Spoiler:

07-12-2012 , 02:25 PM

#682

iversonian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 21,441

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington

what sort of posts arent viewable on phone?

title peeks? white texts? spoilers?

serious question

all three of those.

(y u ask if u already know the answer?)

07-12-2012 , 02:25 PM

#683

Krayz

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 47,277

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington

what sort of posts arent viewable on phone?

title peeks? white texts? spoilers?

serious question

You can't view quotes in spoilers. Other 2 are visible.

07-12-2012 , 02:25 PM

#684

Krayz

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 47,277

Quote:

Originally Posted by iversonian

all three of those.

(y u ask if u already know the answer?)

wat

07-12-2012 , 02:25 PM

#685

metsandfinsfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 158,692

Quote:

Originally Posted by CalledDownLight

you should have mod killed them all if it was rule

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hurp Durpington

what sort of posts arent viewable on phone?

title peeks? white texts? spoilers?

serious question

yes

spoilers can be at times, but with the 2+2 app you would have to hit reply. and you cannot reply to a locked thread

so yes, they are really bad for phone posters

I know i do the nested spoiler bs. but i would gladly stop if it were made a rule

07-12-2012 , 02:26 PM

#686

Alrighty Roo

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jun 2011 Posts: 16,269

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin

Spoiler:

Crossnerd was way too aggressive but that's gotta be one of the GOAT posts.

07-12-2012 , 02:26 PM

#687

Henrik Sedin

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 17,915

iver: your crusade against gimmicks seems strange since you have a history playing on many

well, at least 2 that i know of...

and the one antagonized your team and got you booted from chat.

07-12-2012 , 02:26 PM

#688

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Title peeks are not viewable with App.

Nor white text afaik? Maybe it is, though.

07-12-2012 , 02:27 PM

#689

Krayz

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 47,277

Quote:

Originally Posted by metsandfinsfan

you should have mod killed them all if it was rule

yes

spoilers can be at times, but with the 2+2 app you would have to hit reply. and you cannot reply to a locked thread

so yes, they are really bad for phone posters

I know i do the nested spoiler bs. but i would gladly stop if it were made a rule

Nested spoilers I can read on phone afaik

07-12-2012 , 02:27 PM

#690

Krayz

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 47,277

Quote:

Originally Posted by chim17

Title peeks are not viewable with App.

Nor white text afaik? Maybe it is, though.

Title peeks are viewable FYI, quote someone's post.

07-12-2012 , 02:27 PM

#691

metsandfinsfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 158,692

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krayz

You can't view quotes in spoilers. Other 2 are visible.

you cant view spoiler period in the android app. well if you hit reply is a workaround, but not a convenient one. and not when the thread is locked

07-12-2012 , 02:28 PM

#692

CPHoya

Warden of Taipan Island

Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 73,265

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gadarene

Succintly said.

(Although I didn't know that missing one game day was such a huge deal. I missed multiple game days in Inception because I was out of town. I let the mod know about it and offered to sub out, but my absence still must have had a deleterious effect on the game. I can see consistently missing gamedays being grounds for modkill or w/e, but just missing one game day? I dunno if that's so transgressive as to justify a permaban in any scenario. Real life happens.)

Red part. Also you didn't do that at end-game.

I can't say anything re: the blue but lol tee it up more please.

07-12-2012 , 02:28 PM

#693

Hurp Durpington

Owlpert

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 32,509

Quote:

Originally Posted by iversonian

all three of those.

(y u ask if u already know the answer?)

inferred from all the complaints that i've seen in spots in past games

07-12-2012 , 02:28 PM

#694

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin

iver: your crusade against gimmicks seems strange since you have a history playing on many

well, at least 2 that i know of...

and the one antagonized your team and got you booted from chat.

One of the GOAT moments.

07-12-2012 , 02:29 PM

#695

chim17

Snowboarding concerts and punk music

Join Date: Oct 2003 Posts: 56,128

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krayz

Title peeks are viewable FYI, quote someone's post.

What if the thread is locked?

edit: Also lol cmon.. quote every single post to see the title? That suggestion cannot be real.

07-12-2012 , 02:29 PM

#696

Hurp Durpington

Owlpert

Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 32,509

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krayz

You can't view quotes in spoilers. Other 2 are visible.

huh

07-12-2012 , 02:29 PM

#697

metsandfinsfan

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Jan 2006 Posts: 158,692

Quote:

Originally Posted by Krayz

Title peeks are viewable FYI, quote someone's post.

not on the mobil page

or the 2+2 app
yes in dolphin browser or things like that you could

but you need to be ameniable to all phone posters

07-12-2012 , 02:29 PM

#698

iversonian

Carpal \'Tunnel

Join Date: Sep 2003 Posts: 21,441

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin

iver: your crusade against gimmicks seems strange since you have a history playing on many

well, at least 2 that i know of...

and the one antagonized your team and got you booted from chat.

I've never said gimmicks should be banned.

But claiming to be new when you're a gimmick if low

07-12-2012 , 02:30 PM

#699

kokiri

ffermwr moch

Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 52,227

Quote:

Originally Posted by well named

1. no
2. no
3. no
4. no

also it's basically completely infeasible to ban gimmick accounts from POG generally speaking. and gimmick/anon ww games are fun

I think a continuing discussion about gimmicks and ww is fine though. The ultimate problem though is going to be that there's not enough consensus to justify a rule different then the current one, i.e that it's up to game mods. I think a section in the sticky about when people have to disclose them and so on is a no brainer at the moment. I'm not sure about going further then that. But definitely I support game mods banning them if they like, and forum mod supported enforcement of those game mod decisions

i have no problem with specifically gimmick WW games, but gimmicks are forum cancer. If mods aren't the solution, then maybe we go all anarcho-zurvan and just take the law into our own hands.