Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict WW Court Version 1 - The Verdict

07-12-2012 , 01:23 PM
These arguments are silly.. if basically everyone hates playing with someone that's good enough reason to ban.

Probation seems fair and logical.
07-12-2012 , 01:23 PM
if nofear actually said he did not care if he got lynched and was just going to post ponies in wolfchat for burn notice he should get a ww ban as well
07-12-2012 , 01:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iversonian
we need to have a betting thread on when magic reoffends.
We would first need to understand what the threshold for reoffending is.

If magic gets really mad at someone else in a game thread (but does not quit and does not affect the integrity of the game beyond being unpleasantly heated), has he broken his probation?
07-12-2012 , 01:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chim17
These arguments are silly.. if basically everyone hates playing with someone that's good enough reason to ban.

Probation seems fair and logical.
I think the extent to which "everyone hates playing with" magic is being pretty substantially overexaggerated in this thread.
07-12-2012 , 01:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
I think the extent to which "everyone hates playing with" magic is being pretty substantially overexaggerated in this thread.
Could be. I'm definitely ignorant to the truth of that. But this thread sure makes it seem like that.
07-12-2012 , 01:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
We would first need to understand what the threshold for reoffending is.

If magic gets really mad at someone else in a game thread (but does not quit and does not affect the integrity of the game beyond being unpleasantly heated), has he broken his probation?
Imo clear ground rules should be laid out or this could all be repeated further down the line.
07-12-2012 , 01:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
We would first need to understand what the threshold for reoffending is.

If magic gets really mad at someone else in a game thread (but does not quit and does not affect the integrity of the game beyond being unpleasantly heated), has he broken his probation?
It'll definitely be a judgment call based on the circumstances. A black and white line isn't going to happen.
07-12-2012 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
If you realllllly want names then fine w/e.

annie has lolcatted as a villager as recently as the pixar game.
mac sometimes disappears and doesn't put much effort in. Also, burn notice.
Master has 'lost it' a bit as recently as pixar but apparently more than once.

I'm sure I could think of more given time or more knowledge of recent games but I don't see the point. None of what they did was really against the rules (except maybe master but it was due to IRL stuff so imo a modkill was punishment enough) and it's the same sort of stuff that gazz has done. I like playing with all 3 of them most of the time and see no reason to start handing out punishments and apparently, neither does anyone else which is why I think it's odd that gazz is suddenly being singled out.
would it make you feel better if all of POG was witch-hunted at once then?

Quote:
Originally Posted by chim17
These arguments are silly.. if basically everyone hates playing with someone that's good enough reason to ban.

Probation seems fair and logical.

yeah, exactly.
07-12-2012 , 01:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by captain binkles
roo can you at least PM me all these people that have bad patterns?

I'm seriously curious
Me.
07-12-2012 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
I think the extent to which "everyone hates playing with" magic is being pretty substantially overexaggerated in this thread.
tbf i think i've seen at least half a dozen ppl express this opinion already, and i could guess a few more that would prob say that too.

hell, why don't we all PM the mods with our list of players that we hate playing with, and if anyone gets over X number of votes they get exiled from POG...who's up for that?
07-12-2012 , 01:29 PM
you didn't have to delete that, wahoo

I didn't take it personally
07-12-2012 , 01:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
Imo clear ground rules should be laid out or this could all be repeated further down the line.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtpitch
It'll definitely be a judgment call based on the circumstances. A black and white line isn't going to happen.
lol sick xposts

i'm 100% on pitch's side fwiw. clear ground rules are so obviously inefficient, the best discretion of our mods will on average yield a much better POG.
07-12-2012 , 01:29 PM
I didn't delete it...wtf
07-12-2012 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin
well 2 ppl who've posted on this page have rapsheets that are about as long as MG, or longer, but i don't see any witch hunt after them, for whatever reason. and why did this witch hunt take off?

that passive-aggressive enough for ya?

note: like Roo, i'm not advocating penalties against any of these ppl, but the double-standard is confusing, seems like it comes down to some kind of popularity contest



is he that bad? i feel like i must have played with him a few times (i can think of one for sure, but there have had to be others), but i don't recall thinking he was horrible to play with or anything. the fact that i basically have no opinion of him suggests that he can't be too terrible. idk, this all seems kinda weird and i'm not really sure where it's coming from.

all of this
07-12-2012 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadarene
you didn't have to delete that, wahoo

I didn't take it personally
Quote:
Originally Posted by wahoopride
I didn't delete it...wtf
I did.
07-12-2012 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
would it make you feel better if all of POG was witch-hunted at once then?
Clearly not. I don't think anyone, apart from obviously way over the line people like multiaccounters, should be witch hunted like this. I don't think it's a good way to go about this sort of thing, or at least not when the accused isn't present.

I mean people were going nuts at the guy early in the thread, no ww player deserves that imo.
07-12-2012 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin
tbf i think i've seen at least half a dozen ppl express this opinion already, and i could guess a few more that would prob say that too.

hell, why don't we all PM the mods with our list of players that we hate playing with, and if anyone gets over X number of votes they get exiled from POG...who's up for that?
Sounds pretty good.
07-12-2012 , 01:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chim17
More people should be singled out, though.

Ask Karpinski.
and all of this
07-12-2012 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
lol sick xposts

i'm 100% on pitch's side fwiw. clear ground rules are so obviously inefficient, the best discretion of our mods will on average yield a much better POG.
I agree in general principle but in this instance I think magic will be more likely to behave if he knows exactly what he's allowed to do. Feel free to disagree, it's not a big issue
07-12-2012 , 01:33 PM
nazi mod itt

imo people that ruin games with emotional spazzing and obnoxiousness to the point where the game is essentially unplayable should be treated just as harshly as people that compromise game integrity more directly.

i know people will say this is sometimes a valid strategy but there is a line where it is no longer ok and these are all judgement calls anyway so it wouldn't be any different.
07-12-2012 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
Clearly not. I don't think anyone, apart from obviously way over the line people like multiaccounters, should be witch hunted like this. I don't think it's a good way to go about this sort of thing, or at least not when the accused isn't present.

I mean people were going nuts at the guy early in the thread, no ww player deserves that imo.
So do you think that multi-accounters are the only people who can have a largely negative impact on the community?

Or do you think that people who have a largely negative impact on the community's behavior should be condoned so long as they aren't multi-accounting?
07-12-2012 , 01:33 PM
who do we report to when mods(forum mods not game mods) **** up in games?

we need a bribed agancy to deal with this
07-12-2012 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik Sedin
tbf i think i've seen at least half a dozen ppl express this opinion already, and i could guess a few more that would prob say that too.

hell, why don't we all PM the mods with our list of players that we hate playing with, and if anyone gets over X number of votes they get exiled from POG...who's up for that?
I hate playing with Noah because we're always w/v and when I think I'm clear he's always the one who owns my furry kangawolf ass

(come back Noah! )
07-12-2012 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
I agree in general principle but in this instance I think magic will be more likely to behave if he knows exactly what he's allowed to do. Feel free to disagree, it's not a big issue
If people know exactly what they're allowed to do, they'll find loopholes in the rules and exploit them.

See: Mac's angleshooting in Burn Notice
07-12-2012 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDean1
So do you think that multi-accounters are the only people who can have a largely negative impact on the community?

Or do you think that people who have a largely negative impact on the community's behavior should be condoned so long as they aren't multi-accounting?
There's a difference between condoning behavior and having a crazy public witch hunt LDO.

      
m