Guys, it's never binkles. Seriously mets was such an obv villa

"Why would I lynch LKJ to save my wolfbro when I could just lynch another villager?"

Laters.

Monkey, im on my phone so i cant quote it, but theres a specific post im thinking of where chilltown attacks me

Wrong.

Lol

Votes as of post 3230
Night is more than 24 hours away

---

Votes	Lynch	Voters
2	well named	Anarchist (8), hardcoreUFO (88)
1	Anarchist	well named (39)
1	captain binkles	vixticator (25)
1	unvote	Monkey Banana (55)
2	not voting	captain binkles (36), Xkf (3)

Like, im seriously having trouble imagining well named actually believes the stuff hes saying

I can't believe that somebody with your experience actually believes that that's a real 'tmi slip'. It's a throwaway comment villagers make all the time.

Unless Mets had an actual wolf read on rebonk, which from the rest of that post looks pretty unlikely, it's a nothing statement and you should know better.

The fact you're using stuff like that as the foundation for your reads is pretty bad.

I've seen you try to work after the seer died before, I could have sworn you actually did more thorough, real, analysis, but I was also a wolf that game so maybe it just felt that way, idk.

BANKLES IS A VILLAGER

Seriously if hes a wolf and we lose i will take 100% of the blame

Im kinda worried its xkf/hardcore but i def want to lunch well named first

Well now I'm definitely going to vote binkles today because Anarchist won't lynch him later. I agree well named ends it a decent amount of the time, he's the only other player who can really even be a wolf. But if it isn't him and binkles isn't lynched next I am going to be irate. If it somehow goes to f3 of any combo of anarchist/hardcore/monkey/xkf, meaning I am wrong about who the wolf is, then good luck lol but pretty sure there's nothing to worry about.

Binks its just one thing. He clearly didnt have a wolf read on rebonk though so not sure what you saying. Im just reading through thinking out loud. Disagree if you will but you not offering substance just saying not wolfy blah blah doesnt totally help. Also insulting me doesnt do much for me tbh
Anarchist, im kind of concerned about that too but i think you have to look at mets on content too

we should lynch hardcore today because I don't trust people to lynch him tomorrow :P

I mean I sort of get your reasoning on what you're saying Vix, but it's also pretty lol

And no, I'm not being much help right now, I readily admit to that. My contribution right now is to not post a bunch of gifs insulting everybody :P

so you must think hardcore is a wolf

plz present the case

there is a case to be made

pretty sure i can make a case on everyone

but there is no sense in making cases on who i think are villagers

Binkles, do 2 things please

1. Vote well named

2. Keep spamming that you're an obvious villager. If you do it enough people will unvote you.

it was a joke vix, like 'zomg let's lynch a villager today because he's so villagery he might never be lynched otherwise!!!'

between you, me, wn and hardcore I'm not getting lynched today barring wn being the counterwagon and me not being able to convince anyone else. I'm not too worried

like, it's just another statement I can add to my notepad document titled "silly things villagers say and do at endgame"

The case on Monkey is switched from voting Monte to cfd LKJ, and that's it. Everything else indicates he's obviously a villager. I'm moving him to lack clear status. No longer never say never.

I'm checking to see if hardcore is even possibly a wolf right now. He has more bad going for him than Monkey itg but its difficult for him to be a wolf on stuff unrelated to his reads - hardcore is pretty wolfy early d1 like objectively but he quickly corrected that and I don't think has done anything wolfy since then.

que?

mets was not villagery. like, zero posts coming from a villagery pov. either he decided to openly troll the game or was a wolf. sure i've seen mets do this kind of thing as a villager, kind of. i can't recall him being THIS pro-wolf. i have never put him on ignore before. at no point, ever, does he make a pro-village post. not one time.

well he wanted chill lynched

I'm not here to 'defend' mets for his reads though

if you're trying to read him on whether he makes pro-village posts or not then you're doing it wrong

I mean he boasts insufferably about how he's lynched wolves on his last 6 day 1s. But I think if you went back to check you'd find at least half were obviously peeked and the other half he was on a different wagon. His thoughts aren't really rooted in reality.

The point is that here Mets was absolutely obnoxious. He was loud, amazingly wrong, and basically single-handedly drove the village to ruin. That's classic villa-Mets.

You've wolfed with him before, go back through his posts in that game. I promise you that at no point will you feel nearly as frustrated as you will here or in any villa game of his.

I did look at some wolf games and you're right, none of that here. I really hate clearing anyone for meta reasons when their game is objectively pro-wolf, like comically pro-wolf. Mets SHOULD play wolf games like this, if he randed wolf he absolutely should've done exactly what he did in this game. You think he is incapable of realizing this and adjusting? Er, I shouldn't be asking you.

Votes as of post 3247
Night in 22:53
---

Votes	Lynch	Voters
2	well named	Anarchist (12), hardcoreUFO (88)
1	Anarchist	well named (39)
1	captain binkles	vixticator (31)
1	unvote	Monkey Banana (56)
2	not voting	captain binkles (41), Xkf (3)

Yeah I think he is, he just doesn't have that same passion, nor can he realistically be that clueless with perfect info :P

And I don't reallyyy blame you, it's like clearing mcavoy for seer hunting itt and stuff. It's correct but it's so very aids.

Mets has linked his 'best wolf game' a few times, the draft game from 2009. And it was pretty meh iyam, it certainly wasn't like his villa games. So I feel like he can't really do it. But old timers seem to think he was a good wolf once.

Talk to me about well named.

Why did his votes in this game come with so much explaining? They "look" wolfy, without reading the content. I was thinking about that when I reread d1 earlier and it struck me as bizarre - it didn't cross my mind before - and I did an incredible amount of research of one day of one other game and he didn't vote that way at all.

Er, I should actually look into this more.

His initial thought about me voting for him before he posted, in that long post where he votes for me, was wolfy. I expanded why on d1 iirc. But then he returned later and said some of my posts looked good etc, got on Monkey for a bit.