well named in case I don't survive the drugs

byee

If any of these are lynched I will be rustled
Anarchist
hardcore
xkf

Never say never but...
Monkey

Should be a wolf
binkles

Is a wolf if binkles isn't
well named

Maybe I should revise that to well named as should be a wolf due to his wordy votes, and his random push on me yesterday followed by snap voting who I fake peeked wolf. And having binkles as a villager is wolfy.

Pushing anarchist is like a super wolf claim itg

d2

Very early.



Rule of 1 in 3?

Spews me clear, thanks.

Go back and look. He brings up the old game. I say, that doesn't sound right, get me the link. He gets the link. He was wrong about my role.

Now all that can be faked. The plan can be that we can't be w/w because hey, wouldn't we do this in wolfchat? Very level one but there it is.

But here he's trying to use it to softpush me. Why invent a little distraction to clear me then use it as something to push?

Doesn't make sense and if it doesn't fit, you must acquit.

Spews me again.

Very good for Xkf.

Notice he finds two reason to softpush two different sets of players, yet Xkf is common to both?

I think this is about the only time he talks about Anarchist. Will report back if there's more.


Not w/w. I'm undermining everything he says. I don't trust him and I'm trying my hardest to minimise his influence. Contrast with how I talked to Tbob in RDL. There we disagree but I'm much more respectful.

I mollify as a wolf. Always. It's very effective.

Genuinely angry.

You can't fake this ****.

The underlined is really important. See, when you're w/w, you don't genuinely question each other's reads. You say "how did you get that read?" so that your partner can expand. You're not actually interrogating the guy, after all. You gently tickle him. Here he's pretty plainly accusing me of making my reads up.

And instead of explaining, I point out that he's a wolf. Anyone who is actually reading the thread knows I MQ'd Xkf and concluded he's a villa.

If Chill was my wolfbro, I'd be linking the MQ. "Remember, here I MQ'd him." It's great, clearing work, so why wouldn't I want to remind others of it? But I don't. I just allude to it because I don't need to point to isolated pieces of work to try to look villagey. I'm confident I look villagey as it is.

Bit more then I'm going to shift forward to when Monte drops in and stick to does Chill talk about anyone interesting.


This is in reply to my post.

Do I need to keep doing this? This is never w/w. Seriously, if you think it can be, give up Werewolf.

Binkles, I hope you're reading this. You cannot seriously think this is w/w. Wolves ask each other to expand their reads. Then the other wolf expands it. He doesn't slap his wolfbro down with the intention of alerting everyone else to his teammate not being a villager!

I don't even bother responding! I've already achieved what I needed to here.

This is genuine butthurt.

Again, not w/w because a wolf can use this opportunity to list ways he's been a good villager and allow me to agree with him. But he fears I'm not going to and engaging me on the facts will allow me to show the opposite.

When you look at a fight between players, the apparent anger is not all that important. What's important is what they are actually engaging over.


SLAP!

Okay, so here I clear Rebonk.

He's in tweedy and Hardcore's lynch order. Clearing him is a really bad idea for me as a wolf. I've been noncommittal about him. I don't have any motivation for clearing him as a wolf.

I am trying to convince Hardcore. That's important to recognise. I'm laying out a whole argument from wagonomics to get Hardcore to change his read.

I've got to tell you, I do not spend that much time as a wolf trying to get villagers to clear each other.

Ofc Rebonk was also saving his peek. It must have been pretty stressful for him.

Not even curious.

In fact, mostly ignoring Hardcore.

Monkey

and I think that's fine on xkf, I agree the nk isn't FPS'd often. I think I mentioned it last night but my memory is kinda hazy.

Vix why do you think I'm a wolf? Is it just that Mets played like aids? Because that's kinda a villa tell :P I feel like with a bit of work it shouldn't be overly difficult to clear me today and your endorsement would help a lot on future days.

As for WN clearing me being wolfy, if he's a wolf he's in the awkward spot of having to clear me. And if he's a villager I think he should read Mets well enough to know he's never a wolf too, so I don't think it means much ya know.

How do you have this much WIM on new years day :P

Aids is one thing, supermegaids is another

Why do you think there will be future days?

Well Named's content just doesn't match his tone, but anyway, let's try:

This feels villagey to me.


Doesn't fit his being on a wolfteam that thinks Monte is peeked at all.


He's never able to actually say what it is.

I mean, this is ridiculous really for a wolf. He just looks like he's pushed me all game because he wants me to be a wolf but can't ever find anything.

It's almost like he's forcing himself not to say I'm a villager!

I didn't realise Well Named actively dislikes me, but if he's a villager, it really looks like he doesn't if he's this keen on finding me wolfy!

So he accidentally clears me here. And doesn't leave himself all that many mislynches.

I don't know if there will be or not, I can't say I'm particularly confidnt on wn being a wolf right now, your clearance would be helpful on future days though :P

Contrast this with Well Named's entry.

Well Named really looks like a confused villager who's trying to figure it out.

Mets just postures.

I want people to stop thinking Mets is a villager because Well Named clears him, or because he's being metsy and look instead at his content.

He pushes vix. He pushes Xkf. He pushes me. Never really for any decent reason. By peeking Monte he never has to go hard on him. I dont' remember him going hard on Chill either. A bit of blah blah that's all.

I can't clear you after subbing in for that. Wait how many days have you been in the game?

This seems really genuine to me.

binkles -> WN

if that doesn't end it (it will), glhf in f3

Here's Monte:

"I've been peeked."

wat

I want you to note that Mets showed in the thread at 4.53, Monte at 5.15.

"Spew me villa?"

"Okay, I'll try."

He thinks he's peeked. He can't possibly be angry at anyone. He's in antispew and could just not post.

But what does he choose to post?

Monkey reading this it's like you've never seen a peeked wolf befoe

Rule of 1 in 3? Times 2 actually.

Quiet please. It's no point trying to irritate me. You might as well lolcat instead.

binkles

binkles

This guy knows a peeked wolf when he sees one.

rofl

And I'm not trying to irritate you, I'm just pointing out that the posts you're reading entirely fit an agenda to lynch me. Which I don't think is necessarily wolfy from a lot of people, just bad. Eg. "here is a wolfy post based on a fairly meaningless rule with someone like mets" -> skips over a villagery post -> "here is what should be a wolf spewing a villager villa BUT THAT'S WHAT THEY WERE PLANNING"

I can call anyone wolfy using that formula

Make me believe that you actually believe I'm a wolf