11-10-2015
, 02:21 PM
11-12-2015
, 03:28 PM
11-13-2015
, 03:35 PM
after 69 tries, I finally won a DC
11-13-2015
, 11:54 PM
11-16-2015
, 05:13 PM
a six in rack 9 yesterday was too much to ask?
11-26-2015
, 12:17 PM
11-27-2015
, 05:23 AM
Popcorn's inevitable crushing of my dreams of getting in to the DC top ten inflicted another hammer blow yesterday. GG,
http://triplechain.net/reconstruct?chain_id=6215935
Talk to me about round 7. I would snake the 3s pretty much always, I think, over the ~20% chance of snaking the 5s next round. Is that a leak?
http://triplechain.net/reconstruct?chain_id=6215935
Talk to me about round 7. I would snake the 3s pretty much always, I think, over the ~20% chance of snaking the 5s next round. Is that a leak?
11-27-2015
, 02:40 PM
11-27-2015
, 04:11 PM
11-30-2015
, 01:46 PM
Wonder what the record is for most winners of a daily challenge are? Yesterday seems like it'd be up there.
I forgot to play yesterday.
I forgot to play yesterday.
11-30-2015
, 04:44 PM
I was the only red to co-win
Waffles and Paul were 24 and 26, if a 6 comes in rack 9, they will be # 1 and 2.
I find that round 1 play by Dynasty incredibly weak. Why would you place a 1 in the center when you can put a 5 and have so many more setups available for the next 3 rounds.
Waffles and Paul were 24 and 26, if a 6 comes in rack 9, they will be # 1 and 2.
I find that round 1 play by Dynasty incredibly weak. Why would you place a 1 in the center when you can put a 5 and have so many more setups available for the next 3 rounds.
11-30-2015
, 07:05 PM
But yeah, it seems too committal to me as well.
I failed by keeping my options too open in yesterdays DC. I lost in Round 5 by not connecting a 4 because I wanted to leave open the possibility of snaking the 4s by hitting the top and left zones. Is that clearly wrong, clearly right, or clearly unclear?
(Also, I figured I was better off matching the slightly badly placed 2 in the upper zone than one of the other 2s. But that's pretty minor I think.)
