Summer MSPaint game reveal (up chain)
08-09-2019
, 07:27 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:33 PM
JMurder3 is tasked with the next paint, and here is the result:
Well, the paint might be a bit rough around the edges (the long, flowing blond mane the murderess must have been very proud of is no more, replaced by spaghetti) but it's still way, way better that I would have done. Also, every element of the description is right there.
The babies, now clearly alive (not for long, though!) are quite sad aboutgetting butchered. Understandable.
Spoiler:
Well, the paint might be a bit rough around the edges (the long, flowing blond mane the murderess must have been very proud of is no more, replaced by spaghetti) but it's still way, way better that I would have done. Also, every element of the description is right there.
The babies, now clearly alive (not for long, though!) are quite sad aboutgetting butchered. Understandable.
08-09-2019
, 07:38 PM
The starting painting might have been bizarre, but there are some important, recognizable elements that are quite hard to get wrong. Hence, the descriptions up to this point have been quite precise. Is iraisetoomuch going to break the great description curse?
No, not really. The only curious thing is that the babies on the floor (clearly alive in the last picture) are now dead, just as they got killed in Eric's description after being clearly alive in SleepingTerror's paint.
As Uncle Vernon would say,
Spoiler:
No, not really. The only curious thing is that the babies on the floor (clearly alive in the last picture) are now dead, just as they got killed in Eric's description after being clearly alive in SleepingTerror's paint.
As Uncle Vernon would say,
08-09-2019
, 07:39 PM
Quote:
Here's what eyebooger made of all this baby murdering:
Sure, the painting is quite minimalistic, but not one important element was lost. Long hair? Check. Pile of babies? Oh, yes. Murderous woman killing a baby? You betcha. The anvil/pedestal did not make it, but we can all agree it was hardly vital to the scene.
I have one tiny issue, but that's only because I am contractually obligated to nitpick on those. How do we know for sure the babies in the pile are dead? Sure, this can perhaps be inferred by the actions of the murderess, but what if they're just lying there, still alive and awaiting their grisly fate?
On this merry note, let's move on to carolincadoder's description.
Spoiler:
Sure, the painting is quite minimalistic, but not one important element was lost. Long hair? Check. Pile of babies? Oh, yes. Murderous woman killing a baby? You betcha. The anvil/pedestal did not make it, but we can all agree it was hardly vital to the scene.
I have one tiny issue, but that's only because I am contractually obligated to nitpick on those. How do we know for sure the babies in the pile are dead? Sure, this can perhaps be inferred by the actions of the murderess, but what if they're just lying there, still alive and awaiting their grisly fate?
On this merry note, let's move on to carolincadoder's description.
08-09-2019
, 07:40 PM
Quote:
Those who saw my previous reveal probably expected great things out of SleepingTerror's paint.
I am sure they were not disappointed. This is a masterpiece. From the woman's clothing, it is clear we have moved from the Middle Age to much more recent times. The woman has the look of a very disgruntled mother who has had it with changing all these diapers.
Spoiler:
I am sure they were not disappointed. This is a masterpiece. From the woman's clothing, it is clear we have moved from the Middle Age to much more recent times. The woman has the look of a very disgruntled mother who has had it with changing all these diapers.
08-09-2019
, 07:42 PM
Quote:
Let see what Eric has made of all this carnage.
An almost perfect description, and I am saying "almost" only because he didn't specify those babies were dead, despite the helpful little x's in their eyes that SleepingTerror has lovingly put there. I wonder whether they are going to rise from the dead now.
Spoiler:
An almost perfect description, and I am saying "almost" only because he didn't specify those babies were dead, despite the helpful little x's in their eyes that SleepingTerror has lovingly put there. I wonder whether they are going to rise from the dead now.
08-09-2019
, 07:43 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:43 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:44 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:45 PM
LOL at eb and irtm exact same description
08-09-2019
, 07:45 PM
Now, what is lonely_but_rich going to make of all this?
Oh. Oh God. Sure, this is a great painting, but it is quite terrifying, as -let's be honest- is often the case with lonely_but_rich. Does anyone remember his Ronald McDonald? What about his crow?
I can't decide who's scarier, the peeling-coloured face on the baby on the chopping block, the world-weary soccer mum or the gnomes (dwarves?). I wonder what the next describer thought when I sent him this picture.
Spoiler:
Oh. Oh God. Sure, this is a great painting, but it is quite terrifying, as -let's be honest- is often the case with lonely_but_rich. Does anyone remember his Ronald McDonald? What about his crow?
I can't decide who's scarier, the peeling-coloured face on the baby on the chopping block, the world-weary soccer mum or the gnomes (dwarves?). I wonder what the next describer thought when I sent him this picture.
08-09-2019
, 07:47 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:47 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:47 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:48 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:49 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:49 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:50 PM
08-09-2019
, 07:50 PM